182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23072325)
1. Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity.
Mott KA; Peak D
Plant Cell Environ; 2013 May; 36(5):936-44. PubMed ID: 23072325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature.
Peak D; Mott KA
Plant Cell Environ; 2011 Jan; 34(1):162-78. PubMed ID: 20880202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leaf hydraulic conductivity and stomatal responses to humidity in amphistomatous leaves.
Mott KA
Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Nov; 30(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 17897414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stomatal responses to humidity in isolated epidermes.
Shope JC; Peak D; Mott KA
Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Sep; 31(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 18541007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stomatal heterogeneity in responses to humidity and temperature: Testing a mechanistic model.
Sweet KJ; Peak D; Mott KA
Plant Cell Environ; 2017 Nov; 40(11):2771-2779. PubMed ID: 28777880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generalized hydromechanical model for stomatal responses to hydraulic perturbations.
Kwon HW; Choi MY
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 340():119-30. PubMed ID: 24060618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control of transpiration by radiation.
Pieruschka R; Huber G; Berry JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jul; 107(30):13372-7. PubMed ID: 20624981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stomatal action directly feeds back on leaf turgor: new insights into the regulation of the plant water status from non-invasive pressure probe measurements.
Ache P; Bauer H; Kollist H; Al-Rasheid KA; Lautner S; Hartung W; Hedrich R
Plant J; 2010 Jun; 62(6):1072-82. PubMed ID: 20345603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lower responsiveness of canopy evapotranspiration rate than of leaf stomatal conductance to open-air CO2 elevation in rice.
Shimono H; Nakamura H; Hasegawa T; Okada M
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Aug; 19(8):2444-53. PubMed ID: 23564676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stomatal responses to humidity and temperature in darkness.
Mott KA; Peak D
Plant Cell Environ; 2010 Jul; 33(7):1084-90. PubMed ID: 20199627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating transient heterogeneity of non-photochemical quenching in shade-grown heterobaric leaves of avocado (Persea americana L.): responses to CO2 concentration, stomatal occlusion, dehydration and relative humidity.
Takayama K; King D; Robinson SA; Osmond B
Plant Cell Physiol; 2013 Nov; 54(11):1852-66. PubMed ID: 24078766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling of stomatal density response to atmospheric CO2.
Konrad W; Roth-Nebelsick A; Grein M
J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):638-58. PubMed ID: 18538792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the mesophyll on stomatal responses in amphistomatous leaves.
Mott KA; Peak D
Plant Cell Environ; 2018 Dec; 41(12):2835-2843. PubMed ID: 30073677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing model predictions and experimental data for the response of stomatal conductance and guard cell turgor to manipulations of cuticular conductance, leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference and temperature: feedback mechanisms are able to account for all observations.
Eamus D; Taylor DT; Macinnis-Ng CM; Shanahan S; De Silva L
Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Mar; 31(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 18088329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stomatal oscillations at small apertures: indications for a fundamental insufficiency of stomatal feedback-control inherent in the stomatal turgor mechanism.
Kaiser H; Kappen L
J Exp Bot; 2001 Jun; 52(359):1303-13. PubMed ID: 11432949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opinion: stomatal responses to light and CO(2) depend on the mesophyll.
Mott KA
Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Nov; 32(11):1479-86. PubMed ID: 19627565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicted versus measured photosynthetic water-use efficiency of crop stands under dynamically changing field environments.
Xu LK; Hsiao TC
J Exp Bot; 2004 Nov; 55(407):2395-411. PubMed ID: 15448179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Sites of Evaporation within Leaves.
Buckley TN; John GP; Scoffoni C; Sack L
Plant Physiol; 2017 Mar; 173(3):1763-1782. PubMed ID: 28153921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How do leaf hydraulics limit stomatal conductance at high water vapour pressure deficits?
Bunce JA
Plant Cell Environ; 2006 Aug; 29(8):1644-50. PubMed ID: 16898024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of variable [CO2] and temperature on water transport structure-function relationships in Eucalyptus.
Phillips NG; Attard RD; Ghannoum O; Lewis JD; Logan BA; Tissue DT
Tree Physiol; 2011 Sep; 31(9):945-52. PubMed ID: 21712237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
