These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design. Antunes DA; Devaurs D; Kavraki LE Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1301-13. PubMed ID: 26414598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010-2011 in review. Yuriev E; Ramsland PA J Mol Recognit; 2013 May; 26(5):215-39. PubMed ID: 23526775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A pharmacophore docking algorithm and its application to the cross-docking of 18 HIV-NNRTI's in their binding pockets. Daeyaert F; de Jonge M; Heeres J; Koymans L; Lewi P; Vinkers MH; Janssen PA Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(3):526-33. PubMed ID: 14748000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance. Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improved docking of polypeptides with Glide. Tubert-Brohman I; Sherman W; Repasky M; Beuming T J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1689-99. PubMed ID: 23800267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Protein-ligand interactions: fundamentals. Williams MA Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1008():3-34. PubMed ID: 23729247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The interprotein scoring noises in glide docking scores. Wang W; Zhou X; He W; Fan Y; Chen Y; Chen X Proteins; 2012 Jan; 80(1):169-83. PubMed ID: 22038758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function. Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design. Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Combining geometric pocket detection and desolvation properties to detect putative ligand binding sites on proteins. Schneider S; Zacharias M J Struct Biol; 2012 Dec; 180(3):546-50. PubMed ID: 23023089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence. Namasivayam V; Günther R Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prediction of binding modes for ligands in the cytochromes P450 and other heme-containing proteins. Kirton SB; Murray CW; Verdonk ML; Taylor RD Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 15651036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Laurie AT; Jackson RM Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. New method for fast and accurate binding-site identification and analysis. Halgren T Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Feb; 69(2):146-8. PubMed ID: 17381729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]