275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23072961)
1. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
Stuart A; Butler AK
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
Stuart A; Preast JL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Contralateral Inhibition of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Suggest Sex or Ear Laterality Effects?
Stuart A; Kerls AN
Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):272-282. PubMed ID: 29946686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the Relationship Between Musicianship and Contralateral Suppression of Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
Stuart A; Daughtrey ER
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 27115243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Efferent Inhibition on Speech Perception in Noise: A Revisit Through Its Level-Dependent Function.
Yashaswini L; Maruthy S
Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):508-515. PubMed ID: 31461336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.
Kumar UA; Vanaja CS
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 15064659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The MOC reflex during active listening to speech.
Garinis AC; Glattke T; Cone BK
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1464-76. PubMed ID: 21862678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent 'antimasking' and speech-in-noise listening benefits.
Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
Neuroreport; 2015 May; 26(8):483-7. PubMed ID: 25919996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of correlation between medial olivocochlear reflex strength and sentence recognition in noise.
Mertes IB; Stutz AL
Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 35195043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adversarial relationship between combined medial olivocochlear (MOC) and middle-ear-muscle (MEM) reflexes and alarm-in-noise detection thresholds under negative signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
Karunarathne B; Wang T; So RHY; Kam ACS; Meddis R
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():124-128. PubMed ID: 30107299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.
Lewis JD
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29134475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
Stuart A
Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: A normative study.
Zevenster S; Naudé A
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2022 Dec; 69(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 36546517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
