BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23072964)

  • 21. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Asymmetric Hearing Loss in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Results and Recommendations From a Multisite Prospective Clinical Trial.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Dwyer NY; Reeder RM; Strube MJ;
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1140-1156. PubMed ID: 37018114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
    Wick CC; Kallogjeri D; McJunkin JL; Durakovic N; Holden LK; Herzog JA; Firszt JB; Buchman CA;
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):925-932. PubMed ID: 32857114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contralateral Routing of Signal Yields Significant Speech in Noise Benefit for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dwyer RT; Kessler D; Butera IM; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 30461413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
    Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise.
    Kuk F; Peeters H; Lau C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 21756842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Runge CL; Jensen J; Friedland DR; Litovsky RY; Tarima S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):567-577. PubMed ID: 22192602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Kessler DM; Ananthakrishnan S; Smith SB; D'Onofrio K; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520902001. PubMed ID: 32003296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in unilateral cochlear implant users - long-term findings.
    Yehudai N; Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 22691155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Neuman AC; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH; Neukam JD; Zeman AM; Svirsky MA
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517699530. PubMed ID: 28351216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.