These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2307303)

  • 1. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Shallop JK; Beiter AL; Goin DW; Mischke RE
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 2307303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric CLARION implant users.
    Firszt JB; Rotz LA; Chambers RD; Novak MA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():58-63. PubMed ID: 10214803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked auditory brain-stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Zimmerman-Phillips S; Telian SA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1083-90. PubMed ID: 7917191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Auditory Pathway by Electrical Auditory Middle Latency Response and Postoperative Hearing Rehabilitation.
    Wang B; Cao K; Wei C; Gao Z; Li H
    J Invest Surg; 2019 Sep; 32(6):542-551. PubMed ID: 29537890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Makhdoum MJ; Groenen PA; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9505287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
    Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of the electric brain stem auditory response before cochlear implantation and its significance].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wei CG; Wang Y; Li H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):826-831. PubMed ID: 27938608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects.
    Miyamoto RT
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Feb; 96(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 3753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 16219994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.