These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23074294)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging versus musculoskeletal ultrasound for identification and localization of plantar plate tears.
    Klein EE; Weil L; Weil LS; Knight J
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2012 Dec; 5(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 23074294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musculoskeletal ultrasound for preoperative imaging of the plantar plate: a prospective analysis.
    Klein EE; Weil L; Weil LS; Knight J
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2013 Jun; 6(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 23559623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound imaging for diagnosis of plantar plate ruptures of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints: a retrospective case series.
    Carlson RM; Dux K; Stuck RM
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2013; 52(6):786-8. PubMed ID: 23870658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static Versus Dynamic Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Detection of Plantar Plate Pathology.
    Feuerstein CA; Weil L; Weil LS; Klein EE; Fleischer A; Argerakis NG
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2014 Aug; 7(4):259-265. PubMed ID: 25027985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive drawer test combined with radiographic deviation of the third metatarsophalangeal joint suggests high grade tear of the second metatarsophalangeal joint plantar plate.
    Klein EE; Weil L; Weil LS; Bowen M; Fleischer AE
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2014 Dec; 7(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 25239377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for detection of plantar plate tear.
    Duan X; Li L; Wei DQ; Liu M; Yu X; Xu Z; Long Y; Xiang Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Jan; 12(1):14. PubMed ID: 28109309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plantar plate pathology is associated with erosive disease in the painful forefoot of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Siddle HJ; Hodgson RJ; Hensor EMA; Grainger AJ; Redmond AC; Wakefield RJ; Helliwell PS
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul; 18(1):308. PubMed ID: 28720138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of Sonography in Plantar Plate Tears in Cadavers.
    Stone M; Eyler W; Rhodenizer J; van Holsbeeck M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jul; 36(7):1355-1361. PubMed ID: 28398696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical examination of plantar plate abnormality: a diagnostic perspective.
    Klein EE; Weil L; Weil LS; Coughlin MJ; Knight J
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Jun; 34(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 23696184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can ultrasound of plantar plate have normal appearance with a positive drawer test?
    Fernandes EA; Mann TS; Puchnick A; Tertulino FF; Cannato CT; Nery C; Fernandes ADRC
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 25547326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound findings of plantar plate tears of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints.
    McCarthy CL; Thompson GV
    Skeletal Radiol; 2021 Aug; 50(8):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 33423073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis of plantar plate injury by magnetic resonance imaging with reference to intraoperative findings.
    Sung W; Weil L; Weil LS; Rolfes RJ
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2012; 51(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 22727342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The underlying osseous deformity in plantar plate tears: a radiographic analysis.
    Klein EE; Weil L; Weil LS; Knight J
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2013 Apr; 6(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 23091286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus dynamic ultrasound for plantar plate injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Albright RH; Brooks BM; Chingre M; Klein EE; Weil LS; Fleischer AE
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110315. PubMed ID: 35533558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and High-Resolution Dynamic Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Plantar Plate Pathology: A Case Series.
    Donegan RJ; Stauffer A; Heaslet M; Poliskie M
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):371-374. PubMed ID: 28231969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second and Third Metatarsophalangeal Plantar Plate Tears: Diagnostic Performance of Direct and Indirect MRI Features Using Surgical Findings as the Reference Standard.
    Yamada AF; Crema MD; Nery C; Baumfeld D; Mann TS; Skaf AY; Fernandes ADRC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W100-W108. PubMed ID: 28570126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesser metatarsophalangeal joint instability: prospective evaluation and repair of plantar plate and capsular insufficiency.
    Nery C; Coughlin MJ; Baumfeld D; Mann TS
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Apr; 33(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22735202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of lesser metatarsophalangeal joint plantar plate tears with contrast-enhanced and fat-suppressed MRI.
    Dinoá V; von Ranke F; Costa F; Marchiori E
    Skeletal Radiol; 2016 May; 45(5):635-44. PubMed ID: 26887801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior tibialis tendon tears: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for the detection of surgically created longitudinal tears in cadavers.
    Gerling MC; Pfirrmann CW; Farooki S; Kim C; Boyd GJ; Aronoff MD; Feng SA; Jacobson JA; Resnick D; Brage ME
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 12496521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic and MRI evaluation of the plantar plate: A prospective study.
    Gregg J; Silberstein M; Schneider T; Marks P
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):2661-9. PubMed ID: 16819605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.