These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23074446)
1. Functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of myocardial viability and perfusion: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2003; 3(6):1-82. PubMed ID: 23074446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(16):1-167. PubMed ID: 23074467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(16):1-80. PubMed ID: 23074393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(15):1-45. PubMed ID: 23074392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress echocardiography with contrast for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(10):1-59. PubMed ID: 23074387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(12):1-38. PubMed ID: 23074389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(9):1-61. PubMed ID: 23074412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(8):1-64. PubMed ID: 23074411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(5):1-70. PubMed ID: 23074496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction. Raja S; Mittal BR; Santhosh S; Bhattacharya A; Rohit MK Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1156-61. PubMed ID: 25144559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical aspects of left ventricular diastolic function assessed by Doppler echocardiography following acute myocardial infarction. Poulsen SH Dan Med Bull; 2001 Nov; 48(4):199-210. PubMed ID: 11767125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-detector computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(5):1-57. PubMed ID: 23074474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial viability useful for predicting which patients with impaired ventricles might benefit from revascularization? Child NM; Das R Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 14(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 22279116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional status and quality of life in patients with heart failure undergoing coronary bypass surgery after assessment of myocardial viability. Marwick TH; Zuchowski C; Lauer MS; Secknus MA; Williams J; Lytle BW J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 33(3):750-8. PubMed ID: 10080477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI with (18)F-FDG PET/201Tl SPECT in dysfunctional myocardium: relation to early functional outcome after surgical revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease. Wu YW; Tadamura E; Yamamuro M; Kanao S; Marui A; Tanabara K; Komeda M; Togashi K J Nucl Med; 2007 Jul; 48(7):1096-103. PubMed ID: 17607039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging/Cardiovascular Imaging Department of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology recommendations for the use of cardiac imaging to assess and follow patients after heart transplantation. Badano LP; Miglioranza MH; Edvardsen T; Colafranceschi AS; Muraru D; Bacal F; Nieman K; Zoppellaro G; Marcondes Braga FG; Binder T; Habib G; Lancellotti P; Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 16(9):919-48. PubMed ID: 26139361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical decision making with myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Cremer P; Hachamovitch R; Tamarappoo B Semin Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 44(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 24948154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive imaging in detecting myocardial viability: Myocardial function versus perfusion. Elfigih IA; Henein MY Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2014 Dec; 5():51-56. PubMed ID: 28785612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of myocardial viability imaging by cardiac MRI and PET depending on left ventricular function. Hunold P; Jakob H; Erbel R; Barkhausen J; Heilmaier C World J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 10(9):110-118. PubMed ID: 30344958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]