These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23074820)

  • 1. [Free sorting task of speech disorders by expert and non-expert listeners].
    Woisard V; Gaillard P; Duez D
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2012; 133(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23074820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Construction and validation of a quantitative assessment of speech intelligibility for speech disorders].
    Dittner J; Lepage B; Woisard V; Kergadallan M; Boisteux K; Robart E; Welby-Gieusse M
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2010; 131(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 21086654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
    Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and clinical relevance of segmental analysis based on intelligibility assessment.
    Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Guns C; Wuyts F; Van de Heyning P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 18781075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility in severe adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Bender BK; Cannito MP; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 15072525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic quantification of speech intelligibility of adults with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Windrich M; Maier A; Kohler R; Noth E; Nkenke E; Eysholdt U; Schuster M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 18340110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of time-compressed speech on the perception of ataxic dysarthria: a report of two cases].
    Woisard-Bassols V; Espesser R; Ghio A; Nguyen N; Duez D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2010; 62(4):185-94. PubMed ID: 20460931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech and voice outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer and evaluation of the University of Washington Quality of Life speech domain.
    Thomas L; Jones TM; Tandon S; Carding P; Lowe D; Rogers S
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 19260883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech rate effects upon intelligibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech.
    Dagenais PA; Brown GR; Moore RE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16428230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [From intelligibility to comprehension, which measurement in practice?].
    Woisard V; Espesser R; Ghio A; Duez D
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2013; 134(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 24494329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.