These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23074820)

  • 21. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimal pair distinctions and intelligibility in preschool children with and without speech sound disorders.
    Hodge MM; Gotzke CL
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Oct; 25(10):853-63. PubMed ID: 21591935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disturbed speech intelligibility in noise despite a normal audiogram: a defect in temporal resolution?
    Rappaport JM; Phillips DP; Gulliver JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1993 Dec; 22(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 8158743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vocal tract steadiness: a measure of phonatory and upper airway motor control during phonation in dysarthria.
    Zwirner P; Barnes GJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 1405531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
    Keintz C
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of automatic speech recognition.
    Schuster M; Maier A; Haderlein T; Nkenke E; Wohlleben U; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Nöth E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1741-7. PubMed ID: 16814875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl DA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech Characteristics and Intelligibility in Adults with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities.
    Coppens-Hofman MC; Terband H; Snik AF; Maassen BA
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(4):175-182. PubMed ID: 28118637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring up to speech intelligibility.
    Miller N
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(6):601-12. PubMed ID: 24119170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. DECTalk and MacinTalk speech synthesizers: intelligibility differences for three listener groups.
    Hustad KC; Kent RD; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Aug; 41(4):744-52. PubMed ID: 9712123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intelligibility and nonspeech orofacial strength and force control following traumatic brain injury.
    McHenry MA; Minton JT; Wilson RL; Post YV
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 37(6):1271-83. PubMed ID: 7877286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors influencing intelligibility and severity of chronic speech disorders of patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
    Balaguer M; Boisguerin A; Galtier A; Gaillard N; Puech M; Woisard V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1767-1774. PubMed ID: 30919058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.