450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23075012)
1. A free gift: an adaptive strategy in a single-arm trial using an exact test through the binomial distribution.
Wang J
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 23075012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
Wassmer G
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive statistical analysis following sample size modification based on interim review of effect size.
Hung HM; Cui L; Wang SJ; Lawrence J
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 16022173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical considerations for testing multiple endpoints in group sequential or adaptive clinical trials.
Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1201-10. PubMed ID: 18027226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian predictive sample size selection design for single-arm exploratory clinical trials.
Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4243-54. PubMed ID: 22807115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis strategies for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints.
Chang M; Chow SC
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 18027225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of adaptive designs: efficiency evaluation.
Menon S; Chang M
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 22651106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal timing for interim analyses in clinical trials.
Togo K; Iwasaki M
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 23957516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical analysis for two-stage seamless design with different study endpoints.
Chow SC; Lu Q; Tse SK
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1163-76. PubMed ID: 18027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and analysis issues of multiregional clinical trials with different regional primary endpoints.
Tsou HH; Tsong Y; Chang WJ; Dong X; Hsiao CF
J Biopharm Stat; 2012 Sep; 22(5):1051-9. PubMed ID: 22946949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive methods: when and how should they be used in clinical trials?
Porcher R; Lecocq B; Vray M;
Therapie; 2011; 66(4):319-26, 309-17. PubMed ID: 21851793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on 'How conservative is Fisher's exact test? A quantitative evaluation of the two-sample comparative binomial trial' by G. G. Crans and J. J. Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3598-3611.
Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I
Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):173-4. PubMed ID: 18825654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
Emerson SS; Fleming TR
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculation of tolerance limits and sample size determination for clinical trials with dichotomous outcomes.
Zaslavsky BG
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):481-91. PubMed ID: 17479395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exact tests using two correlated binomial variables in contemporary cancer clinical trials.
Yu J; Kepner JL; Iyer R
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 20014199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory perspectives on multiplicity in adaptive design clinical trials throughout a drug development program.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):846-59. PubMed ID: 21516573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
