These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23075058)

  • 1. Assessing anteroposterior basal bone discrepancy with the Dental Aesthetic Index.
    Huang B; Takahashi K; Yamazaki T; Saito K; Yamori M; Asai K; Yoshikawa Y; Kamioka H; Yamashiro T; Bessho K
    Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale.
    Jenny J; Cons NC
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Feb; 41(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 8639114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
    Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the dental aesthetic index in the prioritisation of orthodontic service needs.
    Maumela PM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2012 Aug; 67(7):380-3. PubMed ID: 23951797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need.
    Otuyemi OD; Noar JH
    Int Dent J; 1996 Feb; 46(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8744915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values.
    Katayama K; Yamaguchi T; Sugiura M; Haga S; Maki K
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23985034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental Aesthetic Index scores and perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students.
    Hamamci N; Başaran G; Uysal E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19126820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Malocclusions and orthodontic treatment needs in a group of Spanish adolescents using the Dental Aesthetic Index.
    Baca-Garcia A; Bravo M; Baca P; Baca A; Junco P
    Int Dent J; 2004 Jun; 54(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 15218893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 3189246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic treatment need and the dental aesthetic index.
    Keay PA; Freer TJ; Basford KE
    Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 16429851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric appraisal for craniofacial imbalances in orthodontic & surgical anomalies.
    Bowden BD
    Aust Orthod J; 1980 Oct; 6(4):154-77. PubMed ID: 6940560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.