These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Selo-Ojeme D; Sathiyathasan S; Fayyaz M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 18189142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. Bahl R; Strachan B; Murphy DJ BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7435):311. PubMed ID: 14724128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England. Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ; Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accidental delivery through a vaginal incision (laparoelytrotomy) during caesarean section in the second stage of labour. Peleg D; Perlitz Y; Pansky S; Levit A; Ben-Ami M BJOG; 2001 Jun; 108(6):659-60. PubMed ID: 11426906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. Fasubaa OB; Ezechi OC; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Akindele ST; Loto OM; Okogbo FO J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 12521457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. Sung JF; Daniels KI; Brodzinsky L; El-Sayed YY; Caughey AB; Lyell DJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):306.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reversal of the decision for caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. Oláh KS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 15814384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study. Brown SJ; Gartland D; Donath S; MacArthur C BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21489125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery. Bahl R; Strachan B; Murphy DJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):789-94. PubMed ID: 15746673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of maternal satisfaction following vaginal delivery after caesarean section and caesarean section after previous vaginal delivery. Dunn EA; O'Herlihy C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 15950369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical insufficiency following cesarean delivery after prolonged second stage of labor: experiences of two cases. Koyama S; Tomimatsu T; Kanagawa T; Sawada K; Tsutsui T; Kimura T J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):411-3. PubMed ID: 20492397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pattern of cervical dilatation in previous lower segment caesarean section patients. Guleria K; Dhall GI; Dhall K J Indian Med Assoc; 1997 May; 95(5):131-4. PubMed ID: 9357257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour. Spencer C; Murphy D; Bewley S BMJ; 2006 Sep; 333(7569):613-4. PubMed ID: 16990297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]