BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23075632)

  • 1. Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.
    Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Saoji A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 23075632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Cowdrey L; King S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Kessler DM; Ananthakrishnan S; Smith SB; D'Onofrio K; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520902001. PubMed ID: 32003296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.
    Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 24556850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing.
    Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Kessler DM; Wolfe J; Blanchard M; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1561-1571. PubMed ID: 32379527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing).
    Neuman AC; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 23632973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Li Y; Zhang G; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112471. PubMed ID: 25386962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation.
    Zhang T; Dorman MF; Gifford R; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 24950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.