157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23075883)
21. Fast Biological Modeling for Voxel-based Heavy Ion Treatment Planning Using the Mechanistic Repair-Misrepair-Fixation Model and Nuclear Fragment Spectra.
Kamp F; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(3):557-68. PubMed ID: 26460998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How LEM-based RBE and dose-averaged LET affected clinical outcomes of sacral chordoma patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy.
Molinelli S; Magro G; Mairani A; Allajbej A; Mirandola A; Chalaszczyk A; Imparato S; Ciocca M; Fiore MR; Orlandi E
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Oct; 163():209-214. PubMed ID: 34506829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. First application of the BIANCA biophysical model to carbon-ion patient cases.
Kozłowska WS; Carante MP; Aricò G; Embriaco A; Ferrari A; Magro G; Mairani A; Ramos R; Sala P; Georg D; Ballarini F
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(11):. PubMed ID: 35576922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Calculation and experimental verification of the RBE-weighted dose for scanned ion beams in the presence of target motion.
Gemmel A; Rietzel E; Kraft G; Durante M; Bert C
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(23):7337-51. PubMed ID: 22048526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitivity analysis of the relative biological effectiveness predicted by the local effect model.
Friedrich T; Grün R; Scholz U; Elsässer T; Durante M; Scholz M
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6827-49. PubMed ID: 24025596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Results of a prospective randomized trial on long-term effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in prostate cancer: LEM I and α/β = 2 Gy overestimates the RBE.
Eichkorn T; Karger CP; Brons S; Koerber SA; Mielke T; Haberer T; Debus J; Herfarth K
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Aug; 173():223-230. PubMed ID: 35714806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The sensitivity of radiobiological models in carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and its consequences on the clinical treatment plan: Differences between LEM and MKM models.
Góra J; Grosshagauer S; Fossati P; Mumot M; Stock M; Schafasand M; Carlino A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():e14321. PubMed ID: 38436509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematics of relative biological effectiveness measurements for proton radiation along the spread out Bragg peak: experimental validation of the local effect model.
Grün R; Friedrich T; Krämer M; Scholz M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):890-908. PubMed ID: 28072575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Test of the local effect model using clinical data: tumour control probability for lung tumours after treatment with carbon ion beams.
Scholz M; Matsufuji N; Kanai T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):478-9. PubMed ID: 17145727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preliminary calculation of RBE-weighted dose distribution for cerebral radionecrosis in carbon-ion treatment planning.
Kase Y; Himukai T; Nagano A; Tameshige Y; Minohara S; Matsufuji N; Mizoe J; Fossati P; Hasegawa A; Kanai T
J Radiat Res; 2011; 52(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 21921434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simultaneous optimization of RBE-weighted dose and nanometric ionization distributions in treatment planning with carbon ions.
Burigo LN; Ramos-Méndez J; Bangert M; Schulte RW; Faddegon B
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(1):015015. PubMed ID: 30523890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Direct comparison of biologically optimized spread-out bragg peaks for protons and carbon ions.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):262-6. PubMed ID: 17935903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conversion and validation of rectal constraints for prostate carcinoma receiving hypofractionated carbon-ion radiotherapy with a local effect model.
Wang W; Li P; Sheng Y; Huang Z; Zhao J; Hong Z; Shahnazi K; Jiang GL; Zhang Q
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Apr; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 33849589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of the reliability of the local effect model for the use in carbon ion treatment planning systems.
Russo G; Attili A; Bourhaleb F; Marchetto F; Peroni C; Schmitt E; Bertrand D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):497-502. PubMed ID: 21131330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Algorithms for the optimization of RBE-weighted dose in particle therapy.
Horcicka M; Meyer C; Buschbacher A; Durante M; Krämer M
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 23257239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Late normal tissue response in the rat spinal cord after carbon ion irradiation.
Saager M; Peschke P; Welzel T; Huang L; Brons S; Grün R; Scholz M; Debus J; Karger CP
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jan; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 29325596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. RBE of carbon ions: experimental data and the strategy of RBE calculation for treatment planning.
Weyrather WK; Kraft G
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Dec; 73 Suppl 2():S161-9. PubMed ID: 15971335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the relative biological effectiveness of active-energy scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy on a commercial treatment planning system with a microdosimetic kinetic model.
Wang W; Sun W; Shen H; Zhao J
Radiat Oncol; 2023 May; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 37198685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The photon-isoeffective dose in boron neutron capture therapy.
González SJ; Santa Cruz GA
Radiat Res; 2012 Dec; 178(6):609-21. PubMed ID: 23148506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]