215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23076029)
21. [Metanephric adenoma of kidney: a clinicopathologic study of eight cases].
Wang C; Song G; Li M; Zhu Y; Zhang W; Zhang Z; Fan Q
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 43(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 24842012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation of radiological and clinical features of metanephric neoplasms in adults.
Chaudhary H; Raghvendran M; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Mandhani A; Kapoor R; Kumar A
Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 15105578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Metanephric adenoma: report of two cases].
Terao H; Matsumoto T; Umemoto S; Onuki T; Kobayashi K; Ohgo Y; Nogcchi S; Kishi H; Tsuura Y; Nagashima Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Sep; 54(9):599-602. PubMed ID: 18975573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Metanephric adenoma and solid variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma: common and distinctive features.
Mantoan Padilha M; Billis A; Allende D; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
Histopathology; 2013 May; 62(6):941-53. PubMed ID: 23551615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computed tomography of renal cell carcinoma in patients with terminal renal impairment.
Ferda J; Hora M; Hes O; Reischig T; Kreuzberg B; Mírka H; Ferdová E; Ohlídalová K; Baxa J; Urge T
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 63(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 17324547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Renal oncocytoma and carcinoma: failure of differentiation with CT.
Davidson AJ; Hayes WS; Hartman DS; McCarthy WF; Davis CJ
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 8430176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conservative treatment of metanephric adenoma. A case report and review of the literature.
Le Nué R; Marcellin L; Ripepi M; Henry C; Kretz JM; Geiss S
J Pediatr Urol; 2011 Aug; 7(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 21220212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immunohistochemical phenotype and molecular pathological characteristics of metanephric adenoma.
Sun Z; Kan S; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Jing H; Huang G; Yu Q; Wu J
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(6):6031-6. PubMed ID: 26261480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Metanephric adenoma in a 59-year-old female: a case report.
Sato H; Miyazawa K; Ikeda R; Suzuki K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2004 Jan; 50(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15032015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Small renal oncocytomas: differentiation with multiphase CT.
Gakis G; Kramer U; Schilling D; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Schlemmer HP
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 20667676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computed tomography characteristics of unresectable primary renal cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant sunitinib.
Salem ME; Shah SN; Elson P; Garcia JA; Wood LS; Medsinge A; Campbell S; Dreicer R; Rini BI
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Apr; 12(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 24126239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metanephric Adenoma in the Pediatric Population: Diagnostic Challenges and Follow-up.
Benson M; Lee S; Bhattacharya R; Vasy V; Zuberi J; Yasmeen S; Ahmed M; Hanna MK
Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():211-215. PubMed ID: 30006267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metanephric adenoma with BRAF V600K mutation and a doubtful radiological imaging: pitfalls in the diagnostic process.
Lenci N; Francesco P; Scarciglia E; Fiorentino V; Schino M; Palermo G; Racioppi M; Bassi P; Martini M
Med Mol Morphol; 2021 Jun; 54(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 33175195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low enhancement on multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images: an independent predictor of the presence of high tumor grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Zhu YH; Wang X; Zhang J; Chen YH; Kong W; Huang YR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W295-300. PubMed ID: 25148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [A case of renal cell carcinoma difficult to diagnose preoperatively because of hypovascular findings].
Nakajima H; Yui Y; Tsuboi N; Yoshida K; Akimoto M
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Jun; 31(6):1021-5. PubMed ID: 3864364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differentiation of clear from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using CT washout formula.
Kopp RP; Aganovic L; Palazzi KL; Cassidy FH; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
Can J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(3):6790-7. PubMed ID: 23783049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differentiation of renal oncocytoma and renal clear cell carcinoma using relative CT enhancement ratio.
Ren A; Cai F; Shang YN; Ma ES; Huang ZG; Wang W; Lu Y; Zhang XZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 25591558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Metanephric adenoma an unusual renal mass: A rare case.
Anshu A; Kumar A
Trop Doct; 2023 Jul; 53(3):400-401. PubMed ID: 37016960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]