These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2307686)

  • 1. Femoral head apparent density distribution predicted from bone stresses.
    Fyhrie DP; Carter DR
    J Biomech; 1990; 23(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 2307686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of proximal femoral stiffness and areal bone mineral density to changes in bone geometry and density.
    Pisharody S; Phillips R; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 18491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
    Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological analysis of the proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography.
    Stiehl JB; Jacobson D; Carrera G
    Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 16896872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach.
    Jacobs CR; Levenston ME; Beaupré GS; Simo JC; Carter DR
    J Biomech; 1995 Apr; 28(4):449-59. PubMed ID: 7738054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anisotropy of osteoporotic cancellous bone.
    Sugita H; Oka M; Toguchida J; Nakamura T; Ueo T; Hayami T
    Bone; 1999 May; 24(5):513-6. PubMed ID: 10321912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants.
    Orr TE; Beaupré GS; Carter DR; Schurman DJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Sep; 5(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 2230816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement of the elastic properties of the cancellous bone in the femoral head of the dog].
    Behrens BA; Nolte I; Bouguecha A; Kammler M; Halbritter U; Besdo S; Meyer-Lindenberg A
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(3-4):160-3. PubMed ID: 15803764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Biomech; 1992 Dec; 25(12):1425-41. PubMed ID: 1491020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone.
    Bayraktar HH; Gupta A; Kwon RY; Papadopoulos P; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech Eng; 2004 Dec; 126(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15796326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of cartilage cap modelling on FEM simulation of femoral head stress].
    Schmitt J; Meiforth J; Lengsfeld M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2001; 46(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 11258139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of Young׳s modulus of trabeculae in microscale using macro-scale׳s relationships between bone density and mechanical properties.
    Cyganik Ł; Binkowski M; Kokot G; Rusin T; Popik P; Bolechała F; Nowak R; Wróbel Z; John A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Aug; 36():120-34. PubMed ID: 24837330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical effect of different femoral neck blade position on the fixation of intertrochanteric fracture: a finite element analysis.
    Lee PY; Lin KJ; Wei HW; Hu JJ; Chen WC; Tsai CL; Lin KP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2016 Jun; 61(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 26351785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric analysis of the proximal portion of the femur in healthy dogs.
    Edinger DT; Hayashi K; Hongyu Y; Markel MD; Manley PA
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Mar; 61(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 10714517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
    Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture.
    Carter DR; Orr TE; Fyhrie DP
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 2722894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical characterization in shear of human femoral cancellous bone: torsion and shear tests.
    Bruyère Garnier K; Dumas R; Rumelhart C; Arlot ME
    Med Eng Phys; 1999 Nov; 21(9):641-9. PubMed ID: 10699566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.