These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2307784)

  • 1. A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Shannon RV; Adams DD; Ferrel RL; Palumbo RL; Grandgenett M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):905-7. PubMed ID: 2307784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A concept for a research tool for experiments with cochlear implant users.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):2949-56. PubMed ID: 11144586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The nucleus multi-channel implantable hearing prosthesis.
    Crosby PA; Seligman PM; Patrick JF; Kuzma JA; Money DK; Ridler J; Dowell R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():111-4. PubMed ID: 6596833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 18538414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital speech processing for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 1475099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Wei C; Cao K; Jin X; Chen X; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):62S-65S. PubMed ID: 17496650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():123-30. PubMed ID: 24161948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
    DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Franck KH; Xu L; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Mar; 4(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 12118364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tong YC; Hollow RD; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3178-89. PubMed ID: 8300953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Eddington DK; Rabinowitz WM
    Nature; 1991 Jul; 352(6332):236-8. PubMed ID: 1857418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25.
    Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():120-7. PubMed ID: 2356719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.