These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2307814)

  • 1. Accuracy of visual estimates of plate waste in the determination of food consumption.
    Dubois S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1990 Mar; 90(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 2307814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of plate waste in primary school lunches by weighing and visual estimation methods: a validation study.
    Liz Martins M; Cunha LM; Rodrigues SS; Rocha A
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1362-8. PubMed ID: 24841068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual estimates of children's portion sizes under both shared-plate and individual-plate conditions.
    Shankar AV; Gittelsohn J; Stallings R; West KP; Gnywali T; Dhungel C; Dahal B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Jan; 101(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11209584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of methods for plate waste determinations.
    Kirks BA; Wolff HK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Mar; 85(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 3973322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using visual plate waste measurement to assess school lunch food behavior.
    Graves K; Shannon B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1983 Feb; 82(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 6822701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure apportionment: ranking food items by their contribution to dietary exposure.
    Moschandreas DJ; Karuchit S; Berry MR; O'Rourke MK; Lo D; Lebowitz MD; Robertson G
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 12(4):233-43. PubMed ID: 12087429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of reporting dietary intake using various portion-size aids in-person and via telephone.
    Godwin SL; Chambers E; Cleveland L
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 15054344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure.
    Blanc AK; Wardlaw T
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Mar; 83(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 15798841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems in using Comstock scale with visual estimation of plate waste.
    Sandstad B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1990 Dec; 90(12):1659-60. PubMed ID: 2246445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch recalls.
    Baxter SD; Thompson WO; Davis HC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Aug; 100(8):911-8. PubMed ID: 10955049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average portions of foods commonly eaten by infants and toddlers in the United States.
    Fox MK; Reidy K; Karwe V; Ziegler P
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Jan; 106(1 Suppl 1):S66-76. PubMed ID: 16376631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependence of dietary intake estimates on the time frame of assessment.
    Löwik MR; Hulshof KF; Brussaard JH; Kistemaker C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S48-56. PubMed ID: 10597614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eligibility for the Medicare buy-in programs, based on a survey of income and program participation simulation.
    Rupp K; Sears J
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(3):13-25. PubMed ID: 11439702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a dietary targets monitor.
    Lean ME; Anderson AS; Morrison C; Currall J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 May; 57(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 12771967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals?
    Yoong W; Karavolos S; Damodaram M; Madgwick K; Milestone N; Al-Habib A; Fakokunde A; Okolo S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 19434419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake.
    Wansink B; Painter JE; North J
    Obes Res; 2005 Jan; 13(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15761167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes.
    Williamson DA; Allen HR; Martin PD; Alfonso AJ; Gerald B; Hunt A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Sep; 103(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 12963941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computational technique for improving estimates of discriminability and bias across multiple dimensions of choice.
    Brown GS; White KG
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 19363192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.