These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079094)
41. The edge vascular response following implantation of a fully bioresorbable device: 'a miss always counts'. Gogas BD; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ; Serruys PW Int J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 158(3):455-7. PubMed ID: 22647412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Three-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging in conventional percutaneous coronary intervention: the potential for clinical application. Farooq V; Gogas BD; Okamura T; Heo JH; Magro M; Gomez-Lara J; Onuma Y; Radu MD; Brugaletta S; van Bochove G; van Geuns RJ; Garcìa-Garcìa HM; Serruys PW Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(12):875-85. PubMed ID: 22108834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Optical coherence tomography after cutting balloon angioplasty. Kume T; Akasaka T; Yoshida K Heart; 2007 May; 93(5):546. PubMed ID: 17435066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Difference of tissue characteristics between early and very late restenosis lesions after bare-metal stent implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. Habara M; Terashima M; Nasu K; Kaneda H; Inoue K; Ito T; Kamikawa S; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Matsuo H; Ueno K; Katoh O; Suzuki T Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 4(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 21610225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Contribution of organized thrombus to in-stent restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: optical coherence tomography findings. Fujii K; Masutani M; Ohyanagi M Eur Heart J; 2008 Jun; 29(11):1385. PubMed ID: 18077442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound. Roura G; Gomez-Lara J; Ferreiro JL; Gomez-Hospital JA; Romaguera R; Teruel LM; Carreño E; Esplugas E; Alfonso F; Cequier A Heart; 2013 Aug; 99(15):1106-12. PubMed ID: 23723447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Is it form or function? King SB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1095-6. PubMed ID: 23078744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Identification of vulnerable plaque in a stented coronary segment 17 years after implantation using optical coherence tomography. Yang JH; Byeon K; Gwon HC; Park JE; Song YB Yonsei Med J; 2012 Mar; 53(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 22318839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Optical coherence tomography findings in an acquired coronary fistula. Echavarria-Pinto M; Escaned J; Bañuelos C; Gonzalo N Circulation; 2013 Jun; 127(25):e865-7. PubMed ID: 23797743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Can we adapt histological injury score for optical coherence tomography of coronaries? Kharlamov AN Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(4):4322-4. PubMed ID: 23701930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Serial 2- and 3-dimensional visualization of side branch jailing after metallic stent implantation: to kiss or not to kiss...? Diletti R; Farooq V; Muramatsu T; Gogas BD; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Geuns RJ; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1089-90. PubMed ID: 23078740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Epicardial coronary artery compression secondary to pericardial adhesions demonstrated by multi-modality imaging, and treated by coronary stenting. Hsi DH; McGrath LB; Salamat J; Simon M; George JC Circulation; 2014 Oct; 130(15):e129-30. PubMed ID: 25287772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Saline vs contrast infusion during optical coherence tomography imaging of peripheral percutaneous intervention. Secco GG; Grattoni C; Parisi R; Micari A; Oshoala K; Cremonesi A; Fattori R; Zeller T; Castriota F Int J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 172(1):246-8. PubMed ID: 24447736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A honeycomb-like structure in the right coronary artery visualized by three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. Kimura T; Itoh T; Fusazaki T; Nakamura M; Morino Y Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jun; 26(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 25647460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Early coverage of Bioabsorbable Scaffold after STEMI analysed by 2D and 3D optical coherence tomography. Foin N; Ghione M; Mattesini A; Dall'Ara G; Davies JE; Di Mario C Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(6):363-4. PubMed ID: 24075359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Superficial coronary calcium analysis by OCT: looking forward an imaging algorithm for an automatic 3D quantification. Celi S; Vaghetti M; Palmieri C; Berti S Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(3):2958-60. PubMed ID: 23611743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pitfalls of angiography in the assessment of atherosclerosis: the role of optical coherence tomography. Toutouzas K; Karanasos A; Stefanadis C J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 May; 24(5):246-7. PubMed ID: 22562923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnosis of an abnormality of the left main coronary. De Maria GL; Ruparelia N; Kharbanda R; Banning A Heart; 2014 Jun; 100(11):891, 893. PubMed ID: 24812144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided coronary angioplasty: results of the ILUMIEN IV randomized clinical trial]. Toscano E; Marrone A; Botti G; Khokhar A; Curio J; Serino F; Rafflenbeul E; Barbato E; Masiero G G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2024 Jun; 25(6):43-44. PubMed ID: 38912747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The case for live case demonstrations. King SB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):895-6. PubMed ID: 23968709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]