These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079140)

  • 1. Tooth movement using palatal implant supported anchorage compared to conventional dental anchorage.
    Borsos G; Vokó Z; Gredes T; Kunert-Keil C; Vegh A
    Ann Anat; 2012 Nov; 194(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 23079140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage systems combined with 2 canine retraction techniques.
    Ozkan S; Bayram M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):763-770. PubMed ID: 27871702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extraction treatment using a palatal implant for anchorage.
    Giancotti A; Greco M; Docimo R; Arcuri C
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 14703333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the zygoma anchorage system on canine retraction.
    Cetinsahin A; Dinçer M; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Uçkan S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 20457580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanics of incisor retraction with mini-implant anchorage.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nanda R
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S15-23. PubMed ID: 25138361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of orthodontic tooth movement between adolescents and adults based on implant superimposition.
    Ruan MJ; Chen G; Xu TM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197281. PubMed ID: 29813088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do palatal implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic load? A clinical radiologic study.
    Wehrbein H; Göllner P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):695-9. PubMed ID: 19892287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate versus conventional loading of palatal implants in humans: a first report of a multicenter RCT.
    Jung BA; Harzer W; Wehrbein H; Gedrange T; Hopfenmüller W; Lüdicke G; Moergel M; Diedrich P; Kunkel M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 20383544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Sandler J; Murray A; Thiruvenkatachari B; Gutierrez R; Speight P; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24974994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.