BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079436)

  • 1. [Danish Quality Database for Mammography Screening].
    Vejborg I; Mikkelsen EM; Schwartz W; Bak M; Lernevall A; Borg Mogensen N; Garne JP
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2533. PubMed ID: 23079436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening].
    Rygaard C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2534. PubMed ID: 23079437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Breast screening and statistics].
    Dige U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(11):1029. PubMed ID: 17378026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [DANBIO: Danish Rheumatology Database].
    Hetland ML; Jensen DV; Tarp U
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2520. PubMed ID: 23079423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group].
    Mouridsen HT; Møller S; Christiansen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2532. PubMed ID: 23079435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Danish Colorectal Cancer Database].
    Gögenur I; Ingeholm P; Iversen LH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2525. PubMed ID: 23079428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Early pregnancy and abortion--clinical quality database].
    Lidegaard O
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2531. PubMed ID: 23079434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
    Brown ML; Houn F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Database for outpatient psychiatric treatment].
    Aagaard J; Perto G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2535. PubMed ID: 23079438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of the Two-County trial of mammography screening are not compatible with contemporaneous official Swedish breast cancer statistics.
    Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Andersen JM; Maehlen J
    Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):438-40. PubMed ID: 17150148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in performance in low-volume mammography screening programmes: experience from Switzerland.
    Bulliard JL; Ducros C; Dayer E; Arzel B; Levi F
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 20729158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening in Denmark.
    Vejborg I; Mikkelsen E; Garne JP; Bak M; Lernevall A; Mogensen NB; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Jun; 58(6):C4287. PubMed ID: 21651881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Danish clinical databases: an overview.
    Green A
    Scand J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 39(7 Suppl):68-71. PubMed ID: 21775356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality databases provide more than quality monitoring].
    Bartels PD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2518. PubMed ID: 23079422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using administrative data to estimate time to breast cancer diagnosis and percent of screen-detected breast cancers – a validation study in Alberta, Canada.
    Yuan Y; Li M; Yang J; Winget M
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2015 May; 24(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 25521706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.