BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079518)

  • 1. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22499708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two p-values without strong parametric assumptions.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):529-43. PubMed ID: 23798617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
    Saha KK; Paul SR
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the null distribution to adjust observed confidence levels for genome-scale screening.
    Bickel DR
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 20880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonparametric empirical Bayes framework for large-scale multiple testing.
    Martin R; Tokdar ST
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jul; 13(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 22085895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
    Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
    Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for fitting a parametric probability distribution to most probable number data.
    Williams MS; Ebel ED
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 157(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 22658686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric estimation of the local false discovery rate for identifying genetic associations.
    Yang Y; Aghababazadeh FA; Bickel DR
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 23702547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias properties of Bayesian statistics in finite mixture of negative binomial regression models in crash data analysis.
    Park BJ; Lord D; Hart JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):741-9. PubMed ID: 20159102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15032780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.