834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079518)
21. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter.
Saha K; Paul S
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 15737091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combining estimates from multiple early studies to obtain estimates of response: using shrinkage estimates to obtain estimates of response.
Kathman SJ; Hale MD
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 17136776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of genetic maps.
York TL; Durrett RT; Tanksley S; Nielsen R
Genet Res; 2005 Apr; 85(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 16174334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating the scaled mutation rate and mutation bias with site frequency data.
Vogl C
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Dec; 98():19-27. PubMed ID: 25453604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates.
Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
Cousineau D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating the mean value of occupational exposures.
Zhou XH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Nov; 59(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 9830086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Statistical analysis of binary data generated from multilocus dominant DNA markers.
Khang TF; Yap VB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Nov; 10(6):995-1008. PubMed ID: 21565109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Slope estimation in the presence of informative right censoring: modeling the number of observations as a geometric random variable.
Mori M; Woolson RF; Woodworth GG
Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 8086614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
Gray G
Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiple imputation analysis of case-cohort studies.
Marti H; Chavance M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1595-607. PubMed ID: 21351290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials.
Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.
Lord D
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 16545328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robust inference in the negative binomial regression model with an application to falls data.
Aeberhard WH; Cantoni E; Heritier S
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):920-31. PubMed ID: 25156188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
