138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079604)
1. Considerations on IMRT for quasi-isotropic non-coplanar irradiation.
Bratengeier K; Seubert B; Holubyev K; Schachner H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7303-15. PubMed ID: 23079604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.
Bratengeier K; Holubyev K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre-segmented 2-Step IMRT with subsequent direct machine parameter optimisation - a planning study.
Bratengeier K; Meyer J; Flentje M
Radiat Oncol; 2008 Nov; 3():38. PubMed ID: 18990227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of direct machine parameter optimization versus fluence optimization with sequential sequencing in IMRT of hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Dobler B; Pohl F; Bogner L; Koelbl O
Radiat Oncol; 2007 Sep; 2():33. PubMed ID: 17822529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Read PW
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 17275112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis.
de Pooter JA; Méndez Romero A; Wunderink W; Storchi PR; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 18585809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a strategy for improving therapeutic gain and reducing the integral dose.
Abate A; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Strigari L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7183-98. PubMed ID: 19920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photon and proton therapy planning comparison for malignant glioma based on CT, FDG-PET, DTI-MRI and fiber tracking.
Munck Af Rosenschöld P; Engelholm S; Ohlhues L; Law I; Vogelius I; Engelholm SA
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 21767174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic intensity-modulated non-coplanar arc radiotherapy (INCA) for head and neck cancer.
Krayenbuehl J; Davis JB; Ciernik IF
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 17055095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simplified intensity-modulated radiotherapy using pre-defined segments to reduce cardiac complications in left-sided breast cancer.
Cho BC; Schwarz M; Mijnheer BJ; Bartelink H
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Mar; 70(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 15064007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiotherapy for early mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma according to the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG): the roles of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and involved-node radiotherapy.
Koeck J; Abo-Madyan Y; Lohr F; Stieler F; Kriz J; Mueller RP; Wenz F; Eich HT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 22079733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Vivekanandan N; Sriram P; Kumar SA; Bhuvaneswari N; Saranya K
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 21940159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Segmentation of IMRT plans for radical lung radiotherapy delivery with the step-and-shoot technique.
Nioutsikou E; Bedford JL; Christian JA; Brada M; Webb S
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):892-901. PubMed ID: 15125007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.
Martin S; Chen JZ; Rashid Dar A; Yartsev S
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 21962823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spherical cluster analysis for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.
Bangert M; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(19):6023-37. PubMed ID: 20858916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
