These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079681)

  • 21. The importance of calibration method in determining the association between central blood pressure with left ventricular and left atrial strain.
    Ramkumar S; Yang H; Nolan M; Negishi T; Sharman JE; Marwick TH; Negishi K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Mar; 38(3):589-600. PubMed ID: 34676490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Invasive validation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) for measuring central blood pressure.
    Shoji T; Nakagomi A; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    J Hypertens; 2017 Jan; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 27763994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two noninvasive devices for measurement of central systolic blood pressure with invasive measurement during cardiac catheterization.
    Ott C; Haetinger S; Schneider MP; Pauschinger M; Schmieder RE
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2012 Sep; 14(9):575-9. PubMed ID: 22947354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of fully automated oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement techniques.
    Gotzmann M; Hogeweg M; Seibert FS; Rohn BJ; Bergbauer M; Babel N; Bauer F; Mügge A; Westhoff TH
    J Hypertens; 2020 Feb; 38(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 31503132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
    Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of commercial devices and methods for noninvasive estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive validation studies.
    Papaioannou TG; Karageorgopoulou TD; Sergentanis TN; Protogerou AD; Psaltopoulou T; Sharman JE; Weber T; Blacher J; Daskalopoulou SS; Wassertheurer S; Khir AW; Vlachopoulos C; Stergiopulos N; Stefanadis C; Nichols WW; Tousoulis D
    J Hypertens; 2016 Jul; 34(7):1237-48. PubMed ID: 27136312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calibration mode influences central blood pressure differences between SphygmoCor and two newer devices, the Arteriograph and Omron HEM-9000.
    Rezai MR; Goudot G; Winters C; Finn JD; Wu FC; Cruickshank JK
    Hypertens Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1046-51. PubMed ID: 21753770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Central blood pressure assessment using oscillometry is feasible for everyday clinical practice.
    Reshetnik A; Gohlisch C; Zidek W; Tölle M; van der Giet M
    J Hum Hypertens; 2016 Dec; 30(12):737-741. PubMed ID: 27121445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Central aortic blood pressure from ultrasound wall-tracking of the carotid artery in children: comparison with invasive measurements and radial tonometry.
    Milne L; Keehn L; Guilcher A; Reidy JF; Karunanithy N; Rosenthal E; Qureshi S; Chowienczyk PJ; Sinha MD
    Hypertension; 2015 May; 65(5):1141-6. PubMed ID: 25824246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of arterial location, pressure wave indicators, and measurement devices on arterial form factor and mean and central arterial pressure.
    Izzo JL; Mukhopadhyay D; Nagpal S; Osmond P
    J Hum Hypertens; 2023 Oct; 37(10):891-897. PubMed ID: 36494516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study.
    Fernandez C; Hsu R; Sander G; Hussain A; Barshop R; Li S; Shu T; Zhang T; Galazka P; Chen W; Bazzano L; Giles TD
    Blood Press Monit; 2017 Apr; 22(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 27902495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Li Y; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Wang JG
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23188416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of central blood pressure waveform from femoral blood pressure waveform by blind sources separation.
    Gbaoui L; Hoeschen C; Kaniusas E; Khatib S; Gretschel S; Wellnhofer E
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1280899. PubMed ID: 38045918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of a new piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure.
    Cuffaro PE; Morales MS; Barochiner J; Rada MA; Alfie J; Aparicio LS; Galarza CR; Micali RG; Marin MJ; Waisman GD
    Blood Press Monit; 2018 Feb; 23(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 29084016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of central SBP determined from the second systolic peak of the peripheral pressure waveform.
    Hickson SS; Butlin M; Mir FA; Graggaber J; Cheriyan J; Khan F; Grace AA; Yasmin ; Cockcroft JR; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM;
    J Hypertens; 2009 Sep; 27(9):1784-8. PubMed ID: 19702000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.