BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1054 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23079814)

  • 1. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.
    Joshi S; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Kulkarni V; Somanathan T; Divate U
    AIDS; 2013 Feb; 27(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 23079814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Fokom-Domgue J; Combescure C; Fokom-Defo V; Tebeu PM; Vassilakos P; Kengne AP; Petignat P
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3084. PubMed ID: 26142020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective cohort study examining cervical cancer screening methods in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Cambodian Women: a comparison of human papilloma virus testing, visualization with acetic acid and digital colposcopy.
    Thay S; Goldstein A; Goldstein LS; Govind V; Lim K; Seang C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e026887. PubMed ID: 30804036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent evaluation of visual, cytological and HPV testing as screening methods for the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Mumbai, India.
    Shastri SS; Dinshaw K; Amin G; Goswami S; Patil S; Chinoy R; Kane S; Kelkar R; Muwonge R; Mahé C; Ajit D; Sankaranarayanan R
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Mar; 83(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 15798842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India.
    Arbyn M; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Keita N; Dolo A; Mbalawa CG; Nouhou H; Sakande B; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Sharma A; Shastri S; Basu P
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 123(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18404671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized trial comparing the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid to Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine for cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women.
    Huchko MJ; Sneden J; Zakaras JM; Smith-McCune K; Sawaya G; Maloba M; Bukusi EA; Cohen CR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0118568. PubMed ID: 25849627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
    Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of several screening approaches for detection of cervical lesions in rural Shandong, China.
    Zong LJ; Zhang YZ; Yang XS; Jiang J; Cui BX; Qiao YB; Li L; Jiang K; Zhang WJ; Kong BH; Shen K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(5):1907-12. PubMed ID: 25773843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of careHPV for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women living with HIV-1 in Burkina Faso and South Africa: HARP study.
    Segondy M; Kelly H; Magooa MP; Djigma F; Ngou J; Gilham C; Omar T; Goumbri-Lompo O; Michelow P; Doutre S; Clavero O; Chikandiwa A; Sawadogo B; Didelot MN; Costes V; Méda N; Delany-Moretlwe S; Mayaud P
    Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 27434037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
    Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the effectiveness of visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine in one-time and annual follow-up screening in rural China.
    Li R; Lewkowitz AK; Zhao FH; Zhou Q; Hu SY; Qiu H; Zhang Y; Jiang HW; Zhang JS; Li M; Tong SM; Zhang QY; Qiao YL
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1627-32. PubMed ID: 22222723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Thara S; Dhakad N; Chandralekha B; Sebastian P; Chithrathara K; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Int J Cancer; 2003 Sep; 106(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 12845681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can Genomic Amplification of Human Telomerase Gene and C-MYC in Liquid-Based Cytological Specimens Be Used as a Method for Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening?
    Gao K; Eurasian M; Zhang J; Wei Y; Zheng Q; Ye H; Li L
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 25832290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
    Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
    Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
    Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Switch from cytology-based to human papillomavirus test-based cervical screening: implications for colposcopy.
    Porras C; Wentzensen N; Rodríguez AC; Morales J; Burk RD; Alfaro M; Hutchinson M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Sherman ME; Wacholder S; Solomon D; Schiffman M
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 130(8):1879-87. PubMed ID: 21607948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of visual inspection with acetic acid and cervical cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia among HIV-infected women in India.
    Sahasrabuddhe VV; Bhosale RA; Kavatkar AN; Nagwanshi CA; Joshi SN; Jenkins CA; Shepherd BE; Kelkar RS; Sahay S; Risbud AR; Vermund SH; Mehendale SM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jan; 130(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 21387289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of portable colposcopy and human papillomavirus testing for screening of cervical cancer in rural China.
    Newman H; Hu J; Li X; He J; Bradford L; Shan S; Wu X; Zhu B; Yang W; Fu B; Zhu B; Gao G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 30640679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
    C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.