328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23080041)
1. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke.
Balasubramanian S; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Sanguineti V; Burdet E
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S255-69. PubMed ID: 23080041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke.
Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 34(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 26890098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery.
Colombo R; Cusmano I; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 24760936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis.
Mazzoleni S; Sale P; Tiboni M; Franceschini M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 92(10 Suppl 2):e26-37. PubMed ID: 24052027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: preliminary results on chronic stroke patients.
Mazzoleni S; Turchetti G; Palla I; Posteraro F; Dario P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 24461799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy.
Masiero S; Carraro E; Ferraro C; Gallina P; Rossi A; Rosati G
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):981-5. PubMed ID: 19841828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation.
Pignolo L
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):955-60. PubMed ID: 19841823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mapping upper-limb motor performance after stroke - a novel method with utility for individualized motor training.
Rosenthal O; Wing AM; Wyatt JL; Punt D; Miall RC
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Dec; 14(1):127. PubMed ID: 29208020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling upper limb clinical scales by robot-measured performance parameters.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Pisano F; Delconte C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975401. PubMed ID: 22275604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a kinematic approach.
Mazzoleni S; Carrozza MC; Sale P; Franceschini M; Posteraro F; Tiboni M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650503. PubMed ID: 24187318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects.
Lo HS; Xie SQ
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 22051085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of motor functions post-stroke: Responsiveness of upper-extremity robotic measures and its task dependence.
Hussain A; Budhota A; Contu S; Kager S; Vishwanath DA; Kuah CWK; Yam LHL; Chua KSG; Masia L; Campolo D
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1037-1042. PubMed ID: 28813958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic assistance for upper extremity training after stroke.
Reinkensmeyer DJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 145():25-39. PubMed ID: 19592784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
