These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23080239)

  • 1. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device.
    Miller C; Karimi L; Donohue L; Kapp S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 25(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 23080239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice.
    Hammond CE; Nixon MA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21483270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
    Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
    Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS).
    Finnoff JT; Peterson VJ; Hollman JH; Smith J
    PM R; 2009 Jan; 1(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 19627872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the test of wheeled mobility (TOWM) and the short Wheelie test.
    Fliess-Douer O; Van Der Woude LH; Vanlandewijck YC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):761-70. PubMed ID: 23041144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the active hip abduction test.
    Davis AM; Bridge P; Miller J; Nelson-Wong E
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Dec; 41(12):953-60. PubMed ID: 22030553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An interrater and intrarater reliability study of 3 photographic scales for the classification of perioral aesthetic features.
    Cohen JL; Thomas J; Paradkar D; Rotunda A; Walker PS; Beddingfield FC; Philip A; Davis PG; Yalamanchili R
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):663-70. PubMed ID: 24852471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
    Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: Reliability of Computer-Assisted Planimetry in Measuring Lesion Size.
    Simpson V; Hughes M; Wilkinson J; Herrick AL; Dinsdale G
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2018 Mar; 70(3):486-490. PubMed ID: 28575546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrarater and interrater reliability of 22 clinical measures associated with lower quarter malalignment.
    Leard JS; Crane BA; Ball KA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 May; 32(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 19447263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device.
    Sprigle S; Nemeth M; Gajjala A
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 21945341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of agreement between rheumatologists in defining digital ulceration in systemic sclerosis.
    Herrick AL; Roberts C; Tracey A; Silman A; Anderson M; Goodfield M; McHugh N; Muir L; Denton CP
    Arthritis Rheum; 2009 Mar; 60(3):878-82. PubMed ID: 19248100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
    Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability.
    Cleary C; Sanders AK; Nick TG
    J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(3):232-7; quiz 238. PubMed ID: 17658416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.