These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23080333)

  • 1. Image-guided placement of port catheters: is there an increased risk of infection if the port is immediately accessed and used?
    Salazar G; Yeddula K; Wicky S; Oklu R; Ganguli S; Waltman AC; Walker TG; Kalva SP
    J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 23080333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
    Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A single-incision technique for placement of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein.
    Seo TS; Song MG; Kang EY; Lee CH; Yong HS; Doo K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 24613268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (PAS Port): results in 150 patients.
    Foley MJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 7787360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of breast fixation to reduce migration of the tip of a totally implantable venous access port in women.
    Song MG; Seo TS; Kim YH; Cho SB; Jung E; Chung HH; Lee SH
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Jul; 17(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 27312751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience.
    Cil BE; Canyiğit M; Peynircioğlu B; Hazirolan T; Carkaci S; Cekirge S; Balkanci F
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2006 Jun; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16752357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.
    Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Predictors of Port Infections in Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
    Zhang S; Kobayashi K; Faridnia M; Skummer P; Zhang D; Karmel MI
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 29960670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Length of Stay Predicts Risk of Early Infection for Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Central Venous Port Placement.
    Tang L; Kim CY; Martin JG; Pabon-Ramos WM; Sag AA; Suhocki PV; Smith TP; Ronald J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Mar; 31(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 32007408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients.
    Skummer P; Kobayashi K; DeRaddo JS; Blackburn T; Schoeneck M; Patel J; Jawed M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 32792279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of catheter infection rates in converted dialysis catheters versus de novo placement in the setting of chlorhexidine use.
    Criddle JM; Hieb RA; White SB; Patel PJ; Hohenwalter EJ; Tutton SM; Rilling WS
    J Vasc Access; 2016; 17(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 26660045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power-injectable ports: safety during placement, therapeutic use, and contrast administration during computed tomography procedures.
    Alexander MD; Morrison HL
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 22610789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Innominate vein stenosis in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.
    Song MG; Seo TS; Kang EY; Yong HS; Seo JH; Choi YY
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25953212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IR Approaches to Difficult Removals of Totally Implanted Venous Access Port Catheters in Children: A Single-Center Experience.
    Patel PA; Parra DA; Bath R; Amaral JG; Temple MJ; John PR; Connolly BL
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):876-81. PubMed ID: 27106735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct translumbar inferior vena cava ports for long-term central venous access in patients with cancer.
    Butros SR; Walker TG; Salazar GM; Kalva SP; Oklu R; Wicky S; Ganguli S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 24507994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outpatient placement of subcutaneous venous access ports reduces the rate of infection and dehiscence compared with inpatient placement.
    Pandey N; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 23582442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between Periprocedural Neutropenia and Early Infection-related Chest Port Removal.
    Perez AW; Watchmaker JM; Brown DB; Banovac F
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):513-518. PubMed ID: 30747596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay.
    Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Port Access on 30-Day Infection Rate.
    Tancredi TS; Kissane JL; Lynch FC; Li M; Kong L; Waybill PN
    J Infus Nurs; 2020; 43(3):167-171. PubMed ID: 32287172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.