These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2308083)

  • 21. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):330-44. PubMed ID: 1772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments.
    Pumford JM; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Jenstad LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 10741354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
    Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.
    Wagner L; Geiling L; Hauth C; Hocke T; Plontke S; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236469. PubMed ID: 32756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The benefits of bilateral versus unilateral amplification for the elderly: are two always better than one?
    Henkin Y; Waldman A; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 18(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 17970568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
    Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-Sided Deafness: Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception in Complex Noise and on Auditory Localization Accuracy.
    Döge J; Baumann U; Weissgerber T; Rader T
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e563-e569. PubMed ID: 29135878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.