These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2308086)

  • 1. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations.
    Assif D; Marshak BL; Pilo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 2308086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation.
    Zidan O; Abdel-Keriem U
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 12901995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations.
    Pilo R; Brosh T; Chweidan H
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):467-72. PubMed ID: 9699439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth.
    Jantarat J; Panitvisai P; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 11137641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique.
    Morin D; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1075-8. PubMed ID: 6379008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study.
    Rees JS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1028-32. PubMed ID: 9879915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cuspal Flexure and Stress in Restored Teeth Caused by Amalgam Expansion.
    Danley BT; Hamilton BN; Tantbirojn D; Goldstein RE; Versluis A
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E300-E307. PubMed ID: 30457946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique.
    Reeh ES; Douglas WH; Messer HH
    J Dent Res; 1989 Nov; 68(11):1540-4. PubMed ID: 2584522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 9611942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth.
    Joynt RB; Wieczkowski G; Klockowski R; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Apr; 57(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 3471955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
    Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Amalgam onlay restoration].
    Doukoudakis S
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1989; 33(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 2486357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure.
    Medige J; Deng Y; Yu X; Davis EL; Joynt RB
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Aug; 26(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 8602435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of mandibular molars with occlusal class I amalgam preparations.
    Re GJ; Draheim RN; Norling BK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1981 Oct; 103(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 6945342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.