These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23082848)

  • 1. Editorial: disc replacement or arthrodesis.
    Tu TH; Ziewacz JE; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):491; author response 492. PubMed ID: 23082848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial: Disc replacement versus fusion.
    Tu TH; Ziewacz JE; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):502; author response 503. PubMed ID: 23082847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oswestry disability index.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):241-2. PubMed ID: 24645201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oswestry disability index.
    Fairbank JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 24266676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion preservation surgery in the spine.
    Murtagh R; Castellvi AE
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 May; 24(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 24792608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.
    Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do interbody devices affect sagittal plane alignment.
    Cecchinato R; Berjano P; Bassani R; Sinigaglia A; Lamartina C
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2014 Jun; 58(2 Suppl 1):87-90. PubMed ID: 25371955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of total lumbar disc replacement on lumbosacral lordosis.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Oct; 25(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 21738074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comment on Wei et al.: Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Liao G; Deng F; Yin X; Lin J
    Int Orthop; 2013 Oct; 37(10):2107-8. PubMed ID: 23873172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Letter regarding article by Wei et al.: Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Wang Q; Wang JC; Xiong CZ
    Int Orthop; 2014 Jan; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 24178062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventive effect of artificial ligamentous stabilization on the upper adjacent segment impairment following posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Imagama S; Kawakami N; Matsubara Y; Kanemura T; Tsuji T; Ohara T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2775-81. PubMed ID: 19940736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical results of lumbar total disc arthroplasty in accordance with Modic signs, with a 2-year-minimum follow-up.
    Blondel B; Tropiano P; Gaudart J; Huang RC; Marnay T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2309-15. PubMed ID: 21252824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining the Ideal Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Patient and Standard of Care.
    Gornet M; Buttermann G; Guyer R; Yue J; Ferko N; Hollmann S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42 Suppl 24():S103-S107. PubMed ID: 29176485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertebral fracture and intervertebral discs.
    Adams M; Dolan P
    J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1432; author reply 1433-4. PubMed ID: 22605515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between total disc replacement and hybrid construct at two lumbar levels with minimum follow-up of two years.
    Andrieu K; Allain J; Longis PM; Steib JP; Beaurain J; Delécrin J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 103(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 27771427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter to the Editor: Smoking status in the ACDF versus 2-level total disc replacement study.
    Bhangoo SS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):516. PubMed ID: 26052823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective study on effectiveness of activ L total disc replacement: clinical and radiographical results of 1- to 3-year follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Wang Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng X; Wang Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E411-7. PubMed ID: 25584945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
    Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.