259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23082888)
21. REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors.
Bunevicius A; Schregel K; Sinkus R; Golby A; Patz S
Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 25():102109. PubMed ID: 31809993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diffusion-weighted imaging predicts postoperative persistence in meningioma patients with peritumoural abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging.
Nakamizo A; Inamura T; Yamaguchi S; Inoha S; Amano T; Ikezaki K; Nishio S; Nakamura Y; Fukui M
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 10(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 12948465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In Vivo Measurement of Brain Tumor Elasticity Using Intraoperative Shear Wave Elastography.
Chauvet D; Imbault M; Capelle L; Demene C; Mossad M; Karachi C; Boch AL; Gennisson JL; Tanter M
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Dec; 37(6):584-590. PubMed ID: 25876221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Supratentorial Meningioma Consistency Prediction Utilizing Tumor to Cerebellar Peduncle Intensity on T1 and T2-Weighted and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences.
Rabiee S; Kankam SB; Shafizadeh M; Ahmadi M; Khoshnevisan A; Hashemi A
World Neurosurg; 2023 Feb; 170():e180-e187. PubMed ID: 36328167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance elastography detects tumoral consistency in pituitary macroadenomas.
Hughes JD; Fattahi N; Van Gompel J; Arani A; Ehman R; Huston J
Pituitary; 2016 Jun; 19(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 26782836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new method for quantification and 3D visualization of brain tumor adhesion using slip interface imaging in patients with meningiomas.
Yin Z; Lu X; Cohen Cohen S; Sui Y; Manduca A; Van Gompel JJ; Ehman RL; Huston J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5554-5564. PubMed ID: 33852045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Magnetic resonance imaging and meningiomas of the posterior cerebral fossa. 31 cases].
Helie O; Soulie D; Sarrazin JL; Derosier C; Cordoliani YS; Cosnard G
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Dec; 22(4):252-70. PubMed ID: 8636802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tumor shrinkage assessed by volumetric MRI in the long-term follow-up after stereotactic radiotherapy of meningiomas.
Astner ST; Theodorou M; Dobrei-Ciuchendea M; Auer F; Kopp C; Molls M; Grosu AL
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Aug; 186(8):423-9. PubMed ID: 20803282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Meningiomas: Preoperative predictive histopathological grading based on radiomics of MRI.
Han Y; Wang T; Wu P; Zhang H; Chen H; Yang C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 77():36-43. PubMed ID: 33220449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas.
Yogi A; Koga T; Azama K; Higa D; Ogawa K; Watanabe T; Ishiuchi S; Murayama S
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 25082174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preoperative neuroimaging findings as a predictor of the surgical plane of cleavage: prospective study of 100 consecutive cases of intracranial meningioma.
Alvernia JE; Sindou MP
J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3):422-30. PubMed ID: 15035277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Meningioma consistency prediction utilizing tumor to cerebellar peduncle intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences: TCTI ratio.
Smith KA; Leever JD; Hylton PD; Camarata PJ; Chamoun RB
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):242-248. PubMed ID: 27058200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of meningioma consistency using fractional anisotropy value measured by magnetic resonance imaging.
Kashimura H; Inoue T; Ogasawara K; Arai H; Otawara Y; Kanbara Y; Ogawa A
J Neurosurg; 2007 Oct; 107(4):784-7. PubMed ID: 17937223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.
Kennedy P; Bane O; Hectors SJ; Gordic S; Berger M; Delaney V; Salem F; Lewis S; Menon M; Taouli B
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108949. PubMed ID: 32179424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation between magnetic resonance images and histology in meningiomas: T2-weighted images indicate collagen contents in tissues.
Soyama N; Kuratsu J; Ushio Y
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1995 Jul; 35(7):438-41. PubMed ID: 7477686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Preoperative Meningioma Consistency Prediction.
Bai Y; Zhang R; Zhang X; Wang X; Nittka M; Koerzdoerfer G; Gong Q; Wang M
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):e157-e165. PubMed ID: 34750066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preoperative radiologic classification of convexity meningioma to predict the survival and aggressive meningioma behavior.
Liu Y; Chotai S; Chen M; Jin S; Qi ST; Pan J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118908. PubMed ID: 25786236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. T1 mapping, T2 mapping and MR elastography of the liver for detection and staging of liver fibrosis.
Hoffman DH; Ayoola A; Nickel D; Han F; Chandarana H; Shanbhogue KP
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Mar; 45(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 31875241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of tumor-brain adhesion in intracranial meningiomas by MR imaging and DSA.
Takeguchi T; Miki H; Shimizu T; Kikuchi K; Mochizuki T; Ohue S; Ohnishi T
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Dec; 2(4):171-9. PubMed ID: 16222111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
