165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23082963)
1. Calculating the weight of evidence in low-template forensic DNA casework.
Lohmueller KE; Rudin N
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S243-9. PubMed ID: 23082963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting low template DNA profiles.
Balding DJ; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Dec; 4(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19948328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
Foley MM
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards developing forensically relevant single-cell pipelines by incorporating direct-to-PCR extraction: compatibility, signal quality, and allele detection.
Sheth N; Swaminathan H; Gonzalez AJ; Duffy KR; Grgicak CM
Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):727-738. PubMed ID: 33484330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.
Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Weir BS
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):987-95. PubMed ID: 10486951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles.
Inman K; Rudin N; Cheng K; Robinson C; Kirschner A; Inman-Semerau L; Lohmueller KE
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():298. PubMed ID: 26384762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on: Budowle B, Onorato AJ, Callaghan TF, Della Manna A, Gross AM, Guerrieri RA, Luttman JC, McClure DL. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):810-21.
Gill P; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):265-8; author reply 269-72. PubMed ID: 20412159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
