232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083503)
1. Frequency of positive patch test reactions to preservatives: The Australian experience.
Chow ET; Avolio AM; Lee A; Nixon R
Australas J Dermatol; 2013 Feb; 54(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 23083503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preservatives as important etiologic factors of allergic contact dermatitis].
Kręcisz B; Chomiczewska-Skóra D; Kieć-Świerczyńska M
Med Pr; 2015; 66(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 26325045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis: reactivity to topical preservatives.
Shaughnessy CN; Malajian D; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Jan; 70(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 24220722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Contact allergy to preservatives contained in cosmetics].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 17125030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Singapore: frequency of sensitization to 11 common preservatives 2006-2011.
Cheng S; Leow YH; Goh CL; Goon A
Dermatitis; 2014; 25(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 24603520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing with preservatives at St John's from 1982 to 1993.
Jacobs MC; White IR; Rycroft RJ; Taub N
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 8654076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016.
Atwater AR; Petty AJ; Liu B; Green CL; Silverberg JI; DeKoven JG; Belsito DV; Reeder MJ; Sasseville D; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Zirwas MJ; Marks JG; Zug KA; Fowler JF; Pratt MD; DeLeo VA; Warshaw EM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 84(4):965-976. PubMed ID: 33579596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact allergy to preservatives. Analysis of IVDK data 1996-2009.
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Uter W
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1316-25. PubMed ID: 21332463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in the UK, 2004-2005: results of multicentre study.
Jong CT; Statham BN; Green CM; King CM; Gawkrodger DJ; Sansom JE; English JS; Wilkinson SM; Ormerod AD; Chowdhury MM
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Sep; 57(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 17680865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The first Australian Baseline Series: Recommendations for patch testing in suspected contact dermatitis.
Toholka R; Wang YS; Tate B; Tam M; Cahill J; Palmer A; Nixon R
Australas J Dermatol; 2015 May; 56(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 25196101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact sensitivity to preservatives in Turkey.
Boyvat A; Akyol A; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):329-32. PubMed ID: 15932584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive patch test reactions in older individuals: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008.
Warshaw EM; Raju SI; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Storrs FJ; Pratt MD; Sasseville D;
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 66(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 21596455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of sensitization to preservatives estimated on the basis of patch test data and exposure, according to a sample of 3541 leave-on products.
Schnuch A; Mildau G; Kratz EM; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Sep; 65(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 21692811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preservatives sensitivity in Israel: a 10-year overview (1995-2004).
Zoller L; Bergman R; Weltfriend S
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Oct; 55(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 16958921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012.
Warshaw EM; Maibach HI; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; DeKoven JG; Zirwas MJ; Fransway AF; Mathias CG; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Storrs FJ; Belsito DV
Dermatitis; 2015; 26(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 25581671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term trend in patch test reactions: a 32-year statistical overview (1970-2002), part II.
Tudela E; MacPherson C; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 18988088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Formaldehyde 2% is not a useful means of detecting allergy to formaldehyde releasers- results of the ESSCA network, 2015-2018.
Whitehouse H; Uter W; Geier J; Ballmer-Weber B; Bauer A; Cooper S; Czarnecka-Operacz M; Dagmar S; Dickel H; Fortina AB; Gallo R; Giménez-Arnau AM; Johnston GA; Filon FL; Mahler V; Pesonen M; Rustemeyer T; Schuttelaar MLA; Valiukevičienė S; Weisshaar E; Werfel T; Wilkinson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Feb; 84(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 32876992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preservative allergy : An enduring issue].
Kreft B; Geier J
Hautarzt; 2020 Mar; 71(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 31792581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased rates of contact allergy to selected preservatives in patients with allergic contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Sürgün E; Boyvat A
Contact Dermatitis; 2024 Feb; 90(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37840032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health from 2007 to 2020.
Aalto-Korte K; Pesonen M
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Oct; 85(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 33934369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
