138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083565)
21. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Wish list for future features of breast MRI computer aided evaluation.
Kelcz F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S78-9. PubMed ID: 23083613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. When is breast magnetic resonance imaging recommended for cancer detection?
Miller JC; Rafferty EA; Specht MC; Thrall JH; Lee SI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 18312973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Supine breast MRI and assessment of future clinical applications.
Siegler P; Ebrahimi M; Holloway CM; Thevathasan G; Plewes DB; Martel A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S153-5. PubMed ID: 23083571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New technologies in breast imaging.
Patterson SK
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2003 Apr; 1(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 19768885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Methodological features of magnetic resonance imaging mammography].
Kulakov VI; Panov VO; Volobuev AI; Rudneva TV; Stashuk GA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2006; (1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17195628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast: radiologic and pathologic correlation.
Yoon YS; Kim SY; Lee JH; Kim SY; Han SW
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 25052497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An imaging approach to high-risk screening for breast cancer.
Jochelson MS; Morris EA
Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21134530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Age-related structural and functional changes in the breast: multimodality correlation with digital mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Abramson RG; Mavi A; Cermik T; Basu S; Wehrli NE; Houseni M; Mishra S; Udupa J; Lakhani P; Maidment AD; Torigian DA; Alavi A
Semin Nucl Med; 2007 May; 37(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 17418148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evolving role of imaging modalities in inflammatory breast cancer.
Le-Petross CH; Bidaut L; Yang WT
Semin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 35(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 18308146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
Kalles V; Zografos GC; Provatopoulou X; Koulocheri D; Gounaris A
Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 23239242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MR-mammography: high sensitivity but low specificity? New thoughts and fresh data on an old mantra.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Schön K; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S30-2. PubMed ID: 23083592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Advances in imaging of inflammatory breast cancer.
Yang WT
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11 Suppl):2755-7. PubMed ID: 20503406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. It is not all in the CAD or BI-RADS.
Kelcz F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S76-7. PubMed ID: 23083612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do we really need new contrast agents for MR-mammography?
Rachetta E; Spinelli R; Martincich L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S127-8. PubMed ID: 23083558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Potential of MR-mammography for identification of intraductual papillomas.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S33-4. PubMed ID: 23083593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening, imaging, and image-guided biopsy techniques for breast cancer.
Smetherman DH
Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Apr; 93(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 23464688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective study of the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma.
Ng AK; Garber JE; Diller LR; Birdwell RL; Feng Y; Neuberg DS; Silver B; Fisher DC; Marcus KJ; Mauch PM
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 31(18):2282-8. PubMed ID: 23610104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
