158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083578)
1. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comment on ADC reductions in postcontrast breast tumors.
Ramadan S; Mulkern RV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):262; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 20027600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the selection of optimal flip angles for T1 mapping of breast tumors with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang JL; Koh TS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jun; 53(6):1209-14. PubMed ID: 16761851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New spatiotemporal features for improved discrimination of benign and malignant lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Gal Y; Mehnert A; Bradley A; Kennedy D; Crozier S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 21926864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general dual-bolus approach for quantitative DCE-MRI.
Kershaw LE; Cheng HL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 29(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 21129878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and invasive breast cancer: primary lesion kinetics correlated with axillary lymph node extracapsular extension.
Loiselle CR; Eby PR; Peacock S; Kim JN; Lehman CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 21182126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast enhancement and tissues classification of breast MRI using Kalman filter-based linear mixing method.
Yang SC; Wang CM; Hsu HH; Chung PC; Hsu GC; Juan CJ; Lo CS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 19135862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation.
Gokalp G; Topal U; Yildirim N; Tolunay S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression.
Le Y; Kroeker R; Kipfer HD; Lin C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 22544731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast MRI using SWeep Imaging with Fourier Transform (SWIFT).
Nelson MT; Benson JC; Prescott T; Corum CA; Snyder A; Garwood M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1(0 1):S109. PubMed ID: 23083549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
