These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083602)

  • 1. Metals in MR-mammography: how to deal with it?
    Hargreaves BA; Daniel BL
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S56-8. PubMed ID: 23083602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast MR for intraductal masses.
    Harms SE; Harms DE; Pope K; Grear D; Smith-Foley S; Johnson K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S59-60. PubMed ID: 23083603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated quantitative DCE-MRI and DW-MRI to characterize breast lesions.
    Jena A; Taneja S; Mehta SB
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S64-5. PubMed ID: 23083607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips.
    Genson CC; Blane CE; Helvie MA; Waits SA; Chenevert TL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 17242244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging the augmented breast.
    Kaufman BM; Lamarche J; Schultze-Haakh H
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 17242438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages and drawbacks of breast DTI.
    Furman-Haran E; Eyal E; Shapiro-Feinberg M; Nissan N; Grobgeld D; Weisenberg N; Degani H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S45-7. PubMed ID: 23083598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion weighted imaging: a long way to clinical routine.
    Woodhams R; Ozaki M; Hata H; Inoue Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S185-7. PubMed ID: 23083584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast MR imaging: applications and pitfalls.
    Hoisington LA; Scherer DL; Berger KL
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(5):367-77. PubMed ID: 17519373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second-look ultrasound: only for biopsy or more?
    Leung JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S87-9. PubMed ID: 23083617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploiting sparsity in x-f space for higher spatiotemporal resolution in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
    Usman M; Ramsay EA; Siegler P; Plewes DB; Chan RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S171-3. PubMed ID: 23083578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR-mammography: high sensitivity but low specificity? New thoughts and fresh data on an old mantra.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Schön K; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S30-2. PubMed ID: 23083592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential of MR-mammography for identification of intraductual papillomas.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S33-4. PubMed ID: 23083593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
    Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinetic characterization of non-mass lesions on breast MRI using manual and computer assisted methods.
    Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S177-8. PubMed ID: 23083580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It is not all in the CAD or BI-RADS.
    Kelcz F
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S76-7. PubMed ID: 23083612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supine breast MRI and assessment of future clinical applications.
    Siegler P; Ebrahimi M; Holloway CM; Thevathasan G; Plewes DB; Martel A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S153-5. PubMed ID: 23083571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Imaging Artifacts.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):65M-87M. PubMed ID: 26377279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.