123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083609)
21. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
Greif JM
Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative MR mammography in suspect breast lesions].
Schneider A; Malur S; Hartmann M
Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):501; author reply 501-2. PubMed ID: 11960419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The fibrotic focus in MR-mammography.
Van Goethem M; Hufkens G; Verslegers I; Van Marck V; Biltjes I; Parizel PM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S179-80. PubMed ID: 23083581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):I44. PubMed ID: 19920254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy--monitoring: clinical examination, ultrasound, mammography, MRI, elastography: only one, only few or all?
Schulz-Wendtland R
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S147-8. PubMed ID: 23083568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Mammography screening. Senselessly squandered money?].
Rautenstrauch J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Mar; 142(12):4-8. PubMed ID: 10804710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Costs of different follow-up strategies in early breast cancer: a review of the literature.
van Hezewijk M; van den Akker ME; van de Velde CJ; Scholten AN; Hille ET
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 23084960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stopping the drain of dollars spent on breast cancer.
Kneece J
Adm Radiol; 1994 Jun; 13(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 10136526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany in 1997-98 and 2002: cost drivers and cost savings.
Kirchhoff T; Ruof J; Mittendorf T; Rihl M; Bernateck M; Mau W; Zeidler H; Schmidt RE; Merkesdal S
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2011 Apr; 50(4):756-61. PubMed ID: 21149243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast MR imaging. An analysis of its role with respect to other imaging and interventional modalities.
Brenner RJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):705-23. PubMed ID: 7489318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analyzing costs and benefits of mammography screening in the workplace.
Eley JW
AAOHN J; 1989 May; 37(5):171-7. PubMed ID: 2496692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-saving analysis of screening colonoscopy in Germany.
Sieg A; Brenner H
Z Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 17874356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Technology assessment: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.
Shtern F
Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S84-7. PubMed ID: 8796524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Can we use MR-mammography to predict nodal status?
Carbonaro LA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S17-8. PubMed ID: 23083577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
