121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23083609)
41. What is specific in hereditary breast cancer? High T2 signal intensity as a new semeiotic pattern?
Trecate G; Agresti R; Suman L; Vergnaghi D; Valeri B; Marchesini M; Ferranti C; Ferraris C; Manoukian S; Scaperrotta G; Viganò S; Panizza P
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S165-70. PubMed ID: 23083576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Estimating treatment cost functions for progressive diseases: a multiproduct approach with an application to breast cancer.
Butler JR; Furnival CM; Hart RF
J Health Econ; 1995 Aug; 14(3):361-85. PubMed ID: 10145140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Basics of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and applications in breast imaging.
Choudhery S; Hanson AL; Stellmaker JA; Ness J; Chida L; Conners AL
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201138. PubMed ID: 33237826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [The breast cancer unit has a problem].
Ahlström S
Lakartidningen; 1996 Mar; 93(10):880. PubMed ID: 8656788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MRI screening for breast cancer.
Plevritis SK
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10 Suppl 3():S430-2. PubMed ID: 11001471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Can imaging technology advances drive lower inpatient stays and costs?
Kennedy CE
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; Suppl():12-7. PubMed ID: 19891106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The economic cost of respiratory disease in the UK.
Burki TK
Lancet Respir Med; 2017 May; 5(5):381. PubMed ID: 28341204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Inappropriateness of breast imaging: cost analysis.
Pistolese CA; Ciarrapico AM; della Gatta F; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2013 Sep; 118(6):984-94. PubMed ID: 23801396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Strategies for Cost Saving Through Social Determinants of Health.
Peeler AW
J Healthc Manag; 2019; 64(4):222-230. PubMed ID: 31274813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reducing the cost of left ventricular assist devices: Why it matters and can it be done?
Shih T; Dimick JB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 155(6):2466-2468. PubMed ID: 29580654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Mammography: past--underused, present--underfinanced, future--unavailable?
Weber ES
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2002; 6(3):123. PubMed ID: 11998598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. From the Centers for Disease Control. Public health focus: mammography.
JAMA; 1992 Jul 22-29; 268(4):452-3. PubMed ID: 1619736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Economic evaluation of diagnostic follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer. Results of the Working Group on Economic-Organizational Aspects of Follow-up.
Mapelli V; Dirindin N; Grilli R
Ann Oncol; 1995; 6 Suppl 2():61-4. PubMed ID: 8547201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison.
Hall FM; Baum JK; Raza S
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):584-5. PubMed ID: 8685366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Re: "Saving lives: mammograms, breast cancer, and health insurance reform".
Kopans DB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jul; 7(7):545; author reply 545-6. PubMed ID: 20630396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Making the Business Case for Coverage of Family-Based Behavioral Group Interventions for Pediatric Obesity.
Borner KB; Canter KS; Lee RH; Davis AM; Hampl S; Chuang I
J Pediatr Psychol; 2016 Sep; 41(8):867-78. PubMed ID: 26743573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Documentation Time and Effort and Associated Resources for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer from Diagnosis to End of Follow-Up - Results of a Multicentre Validation].
Beckmann M; Sell C; Aydogdu M; Brucker SY; Fehm T; Janni W; Kreienberg R; Kümmel S; Neumann M; Scharl A; Schleicher B; Wallwiener D; Wöckel A; Fasching PA; Lux MP
Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Jul; 78(7):438-45. PubMed ID: 26250614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Stat bite: Use of mammography and annual household income, 1991-1997.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Mar; 92(6):450. PubMed ID: 10716961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Understanding waste for lean health information systems: a preliminary review.
Kalong NA; Yusof MM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():749-53. PubMed ID: 23920657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. 1st International Congress on MR Mammography. Jena, Germany, 29-31 May 1997. Abstracts.
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(4):605-24. PubMed ID: 9244637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
