These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23084081)

  • 1. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
    Brenner H; Jansen L
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Index for evaluating completeness of registration in population-based cancer registries and estimation of registration rate at the Osaka Cancer Registry between 1966 and 1992 using this index].
    Ajiki W; Tsukuma H; Oshima A
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Oct; 45(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 9893469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Death certificate only proportions should be age adjusted in studies comparing cancer survival across populations and over time.
    Brenner H; Castro FA; Eberle A; Emrich K; Holleczek B; Katalinic A; Jansen L;
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 52():102-8. PubMed ID: 26682869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications from Under-reporting at Lifetime, Death Certificate Notifications and Trace-back on the Recorded Incidence of a "Newly" Established Population-based Cancer Registry.
    Holleczek B; Brenner H
    Methods Inf Med; 2016; 55(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 26678331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restriction to period of interest improves informative value of death certificate only proportions in period analysis of cancer survival.
    Brenner H; Jansen L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1432-9. PubMed ID: 25881488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deriving valid population-based cancer survival estimates in the presence of nonnegligible proportions of cancers notified by death certificates only.
    Brenner H; Holleczek B
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Dec; 20(12):2480-6. PubMed ID: 21960691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
    Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Relationship of proportion of DCO cases in cancer registration to gastric cancer screening participation rate and proportion of all referred inpatients diagnosed with neoplasm].
    Nagai Y; Koinuma N
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 40(7):567-70. PubMed ID: 8369534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
    Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does exclusion of cancers registered only from death-certificate information diminish socio-demographic disparities in recorded survival?
    Tervonen HE; Roder D; Morrell S; You H; Currow DC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():70-77. PubMed ID: 28419901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of the death certificate only index as a measure of incompleteness of cancer registration.
    Brenner H
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):506-10. PubMed ID: 7640240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of using multiple causes of death codes to compute site-specific, death certificate-based cancer mortality statistics in the United States.
    Fink AK; German RR; Heron M; Stewart SL; Johnson CJ; Finch JL; Yin D; Schaeffer PE;
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 21907006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mixed linear model controlling for case underascertainment across multiple cancer registries estimated time trends in survival.
    Dahm S; Bertz J; Barnes B; Kraywinkel K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():111-121. PubMed ID: 29329676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
    Pollock AM; Vickers N
    Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer Incidence in Older Adults in the United States: Characteristics, Specificity, and Completeness of the Data.
    Weir HK; Sherman R; Yu M; Gershman S; Hofer BM; Wu M; Green D
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(3):150-160. PubMed ID: 33584972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of population-based cancer survival estimates by trace back of death certificate notifications: an empirical illustration.
    Holleczek B; Brenner H
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Apr; 48(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 21703847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency and determinants of missing data in clinical and prognostic variables recently added to SEER.
    Kim HM; Goodman M; Kim BI; Ward KC
    J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(3):120-31. PubMed ID: 22223054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of recording uterine cancer in death certification in France and age-specific proportions of deaths from cervix and corpus uteri.
    Rogel A; Belot A; Suzan F; Bossard N; Boussac M; Arveux P; Buémi A; Colonna M; Danzon A; Ganry O; Guizard AV; Grosclaude P; Velten M; Jougla E; Iwaz J; Estève J; Chérié-Challine L; Remontet L
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 21106450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.