These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23085143)

  • 21. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal Distinctiveness in Task Switching: Assessing the Mixture-Distribution Assumption.
    Grange JA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():251. PubMed ID: 26941697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Competitor rule priming: evidence for priming of task rules in task switching.
    Katzir M; Ori B; Hsieh S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):446-62. PubMed ID: 24947758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The hierarchy of task decision and response selection: a task-switching event related potentials study.
    Braverman A; Berger A; Meiran N
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jul; 88():35-42. PubMed ID: 24859089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Kiesel A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 23743343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.
    Meiran N; Pereg M
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Go with the flow: how the consideration of joy versus pride influences automaticity.
    Katzir M; Ori B; Eyal T; Meiran N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():57-66. PubMed ID: 25557202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociating action inhibition, conflict monitoring and sensory mismatch into independent components of event related potentials in GO/NOGO task.
    Kropotov JD; Ponomarev VA; Hollup S; Mueller A
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jul; 57(2):565-75. PubMed ID: 21571079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response-cue interval effects in extended-runs task switching: memory, or monitoring?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):1007-1019. PubMed ID: 28951972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response-repetition costs in choice-RT tasks: biased expectancies or response inhibition?
    Druey MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():21-32. PubMed ID: 24269885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.