These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2308541)

  • 1. Evaluation of analog contrast enhancement and digital unsharp masking in low-contrast portal images.
    Weiser JC; Gur D; Gennari RC; Deutsch M
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 2308541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of storage phosphors for portal imaging in radiation therapy: therapists' perception of image quality.
    Gur D; Deutsch M; Fuhrman CR; Clayton PA; Weiser JC; Rosenthal MS; Bukovitz AG
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 2921972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility.
    Rosenman J; Roe CA; Cromartie R; Muller KE; Pizer SM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Jan; 25(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 8420883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital storage phosphor radiography for treatment verification in radiotherapy.
    Scheck RJ; Wendt T; Panzer M
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 66(789):801-6. PubMed ID: 8220952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary results with digital luminescence radiography in radiotherapy].
    Reichelt S; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Schulte RM; Renner KH; Galanski M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Jul; 166(7):483-6. PubMed ID: 2382211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Megavoltage portal films using computed radiographic imaging with photostimulable phosphors.
    Wilenzick RM; Merritt CR; Balter S
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 3600529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M; Galanski M; Oestmann JW; von Falkenhausen U; Rosenthal H; Reimer P; Nischelsky J; Reichelt S
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
    Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
    Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography of the spine, large bones and joints using stimulable phosphor. Early clinical experience.
    Pettersson H; Aspelin P; Boijsen E; Herrlin K; Egund N
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 2968093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of image quality in portal imaging using a combination of a storage phosphor plate and diagnostic cassette.
    Fujita H; Yamaguchi M; Fujioka T; Fukuda H; Murase K
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):504-8. PubMed ID: 19153183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
    Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.