These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2308541)

  • 21. [Contribution of a new technique of digital enhancement for the control of radiation fields].
    Giraud P; Caselles O; Duthil P; Alzieu C; Lucot H; Daly-Schveitzer N
    Bull Cancer Radiother; 1995; 82(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 8554891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Monitor assessment of digitalized and post-processed portal films compared to conventional films presented on a light box].
    Wachter S; Gerstner N; Colotto A; Battmann A; Gahleitner A; Haverkamp U; Pötter R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1998 Nov; 174(11):589-96. PubMed ID: 9830441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W; Chowanetz W; Horwitz AE; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A double exposed portal image comparison between electronic portal imaging hard copies and port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center.
    Hatherly KE; Smylie JC; Rodger A; Dally MJ; Davis SR; Millar JL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 11163514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
    Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic digital contrast enhancement of radiotherapy films.
    Sherouse GW; Rosenman J; McMurry HL; Pizer SM; Chaney EL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1987 May; 13(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 3570904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast improvement in a new radiotherapy imaging system.
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Gelosa S; Monti AF; Cacciatori M; Cazzaniga F
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175(4):182-4. PubMed ID: 10230461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Photographic unsharp masking in chest radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Niklason LT; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 7275540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Edge enhancement of computed tomograms by digital unsharp masking.
    Winter J
    Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):234-5. PubMed ID: 7360972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A method of estimating doses in digital luminescent radiography].
    Bick U; Fiebich M; Lenzen H; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1991 Jan; 31(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 2006256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of image process parameters through factorial experiments using a flat panel detector.
    Norrman E; Geijer H; Persliden J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5263-76. PubMed ID: 17762085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
    Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimum wavelet based masking for the contrast enhancement of medical images using enhanced cuckoo search algorithm.
    Daniel E; Anitha J
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():149-55. PubMed ID: 26945462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.