170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23085459)
1. Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening coverage and follow-up of high grade abnormal results in a population-based cohort.
Elit L; Saskin R; Raut R; Elliott L; Murphy J; Marrett L
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 128(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 23085459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.
Elit L; Krzyzanowska M; Saskin R; Barbera L; Razzaq A; Lofters A; Yeritsyan N; Bierman A
Can Fam Physician; 2012 Jan; 58(1):e22-31. PubMed ID: 22267636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical Screening and Colposcopy Management of Women Age 24 and Under.
Buick C; Jembere N; Wang L; Kupets R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Dec; 42(12):1518-1524. PubMed ID: 32988802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Patient-Directed Cytology Results Correspondence Program on Follow-Up of High-Grade Pap Tests.
Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Kupets R
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1461-1469. PubMed ID: 31053566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of a Decade of Routine Cervical Screening in a Canadian Adolescent Obstetrics Clinic.
Korkidakis A; Bryson P; Jamieson MA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Jan; 38(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 26872756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of current patterns of Pap smear and colposcopy use.
Kavanagh AM; Santow G; Mitchell H
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8861048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population.
Engelstad LP; Stewart SL; Nguyen BH; Bedeian KL; Rubin MM; Pasick RJ; Hiatt RA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Oct; 10(10):1015-20. PubMed ID: 11588126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance measures related to colposcopy for canadian cervical cancer screening programs: identifying areas for improvement.
Decker KM; McLachlin CM; Lotocki R;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Mar; 37(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 26001871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004-2006.
Tangka FK; O'Hara B; Gardner JG; Turner J; Royalty J; Shaw K; Sabatino S; Hall IJ; Coates RJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1081-90. PubMed ID: 20361353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The association between cervical cancer screening and mortality from cervical cancer: a population based case-control study.
Vicus D; Sutradhar R; Lu Y; Elit L; Kupets R; Paszat L;
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 24589414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histopathologic follow-up and HPV test results with HSIL Papanicolaou test results in China's largest academic women's hospital.
Tao X; Austin RM; Zhang H; Zhang L; Xiao J; Zhou X; Wang L; Zhao C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):947-953. PubMed ID: 28885778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of management of high-grade cervical lesions in a single visit: a randomized controlled trial.
Brewster WR; Hubbell FA; Largent J; Ziogas A; Lin F; Howe S; Ganiats TG; Anton-Culver H; Manetta A
JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(17):2182-7. PubMed ID: 16264159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.
MacLaughlin KL; Kessler ME; Komandur Elayavilli R; Hickey BC; Scheitel MR; Wagholikar KB; Liu H; Kremers WK; Chaudhry R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 May; 27(5):569-574. PubMed ID: 29297754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
