579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23085644)
1. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer.
Plodinec M; Loparic M; Monnier CA; Obermann EC; Zanetti-Dallenbach R; Oertle P; Hyotyla JT; Aebi U; Bentires-Alj M; Lim RY; Schoenenberger CA
Nat Nanotechnol; 2012 Nov; 7(11):757-65. PubMed ID: 23085644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ultrastructural and nanomechanical signature of platelets from acute myocardial infarction and platelet activation.
Li A; Chen J; Liang ZH; Cai J; Cai HH; Chen M
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Apr; 486(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 28274875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Length Scale Matters: Real-Time Elastography versus Nanomechanical Profiling by Atomic Force Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.
Zanetti-Dällenbach R; Plodinec M; Oertle P; Redling K; Obermann EC; Lim RYH; Schoenenberger CA
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3840597. PubMed ID: 30410929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nanomechanical characterization of living mammary tissues by atomic force microscopy.
Plodinec M; Lim RY
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1293():231-46. PubMed ID: 26040692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanomechanical properties of solid tumors as treatment monitoring biomarkers.
Stylianou A; Mpekris F; Voutouri C; Papoui A; Constantinidou A; Kitiris E; Kailides M; Stylianopoulos T
Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():324-334. PubMed ID: 36244596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreatic Cancer Presents Distinct Nanomechanical Properties During Progression.
Stylianou A; Voutouri C; Mpekris F; Stylianopoulos T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jul; 51(7):1602-1615. PubMed ID: 36813931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.
Cross SE; Jin YS; Rao J; Gimzewski JK
Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 Dec; 2(12):780-3. PubMed ID: 18654431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Actin Organization on the Stiffness of Living Breast Cancer Cells Revealed by Peak-Force Modulation Atomic Force Microscopy.
Calzado-Martín A; Encinar M; Tamayo J; Calleja M; San Paulo A
ACS Nano; 2016 Mar; 10(3):3365-74. PubMed ID: 26901115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A convolutional neural network STIFMap reveals associations between stromal stiffness and EMT in breast cancer.
Stashko C; Hayward MK; Northey JJ; Pearson N; Ironside AJ; Lakins JN; Oria R; Goyette MA; Mayo L; Russnes HG; Hwang ES; Kutys ML; Polyak K; Weaver VM
Nat Commun; 2023 Jun; 14(1):3561. PubMed ID: 37322009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mint3 in bone marrow-derived cells promotes lung metastasis in breast cancer model mice.
Hara T; Murakami Y; Seiki M; Sakamoto T
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Aug; 490(3):688-692. PubMed ID: 28634075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atomic force microscopy reveals age-dependent changes in nanomechanical properties of the extracellular matrix of native human menisci: implications for joint degeneration and osteoarthritis.
Kwok J; Grogan S; Meckes B; Arce F; Lal R; D'Lima D
Nanomedicine; 2014 Nov; 10(8):1777-85. PubMed ID: 24972006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells.
Li QS; Lee GY; Ong CN; Lim CT
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2008 Oct; 374(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 18656442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines.
Rother J; Nöding H; Mey I; Janshoff A
Open Biol; 2014 May; 4(5):140046. PubMed ID: 24850913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis of the cell-surface roughness and viscoelasticity for breast cancer cells discrimination using atomic force microscopy.
Wang Y; Xu C; Jiang N; Zheng L; Zeng J; Qiu C; Yang H; Xie S
Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):558-563. PubMed ID: 26750438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cadherin-11 promotes neural crest cell spreading by reducing intracellular tension-Mapping adhesion and mechanics in neural crest explants by atomic force microscopy.
Blaue C; Kashef J; Franz CM
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2018 Jan; 73():95-106. PubMed ID: 28919310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. P38 delta MAPK promotes breast cancer progression and lung metastasis by enhancing cell proliferation and cell detachment.
Wada M; Canals D; Adada M; Coant N; Salama MF; Helke KL; Arthur JS; Shroyer KR; Kitatani K; Obeid LM; Hannun YA
Oncogene; 2017 Nov; 36(47):6649-6657. PubMed ID: 28783172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluidity and elasticity form a concise set of viscoelastic biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis based on Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative modeling.
Zhang H; Guo Y; Zhou Y; Zhu H; Wu P; Wang K; Ruan L; Wan M; Insana MF
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2163-2177. PubMed ID: 32335785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-mechanical characterization of lung tissue using atomic force microscopy.
Liu F; Tschumperlin DJ
J Vis Exp; 2011 Aug; (54):. PubMed ID: 21897356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atomic force microscopy: A tip for diagnosing cancer.
Lekka M
Nat Nanotechnol; 2012 Nov; 7(11):691-2. PubMed ID: 23132222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The matrix environmental and cell mechanical properties regulate cell migration and contribute to the invasive phenotype of cancer cells.
Mierke CT
Rep Prog Phys; 2019 Jun; 82(6):064602. PubMed ID: 30947151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
