423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23086698)
1. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Meng ZY; Hu B; Shen E
Breast Cancer; 2014 Nov; 21(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 25224719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chung SY; Park SH; Park JM; Han BK; Choe YH; Cho G; Im JG
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 16304106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Kim SM; Park SH; Han BK; Choe YH; Park JM; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17090709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging.
Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003).
Park CS; Lee JH; Yim HW; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Jung JI; Jung NY; Kim SH
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 17923782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner.
Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of second-look ultrasound examinations for MR-detected lesions in patients with breast cancer.
Lee SH; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun BL; Kang E; Kim SW; Park SY; Ahn HS; Chang JH; Yoo Y; Song TK; Moon WK
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Apr; 36(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 25750138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
