223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23086802)
1. Robot assisted surgery in gynaecologic oncology - starting a program and initial learning curve from a UK tertiary referral centre: the Guildford perspective.
Madhuri TK; Hamzawala I; Tailor A; Butler-Manuel S
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 23086802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing robotic surgery to gynecologic oncology: the first 300 operations performed at a tertiary hospital.
Mäenpää M; Nieminen K; Tomás E; Luukkaala T; Mäenpää JU
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 25721212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up.
Sert MB; Eraker R
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 19569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal].
Bartos P; Struppl D; Trhlík M; Czudek S; Skrovina M; Adamcík L; Soumarová R
Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Oct; 72(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 18175521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Sinno AK; Fader AN
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):922-32. PubMed ID: 25274485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [New approach of learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic oncology surgery].
Yaribakht S; Guillemin F; Harter V; Malartic C; Marchal F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 May; 43(5):348-55. PubMed ID: 25813433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful incorporation of robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology fellowship training.
Soliman PT; Iglesias D; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Nick AM; Schmeler KM; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):730-3. PubMed ID: 24055616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Feasibility study about the single-port in gynecologic oncology surgery].
Heinemann M; Cannone F; Lambaudie E; Michel V; Buttarelli M; Bannier M; Houvenaghel G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Sep; 41(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 22633038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Yim GW; Kim YT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22123220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Side-docking in robotic-assisted gynaecologic cancer surgery.
Woods DL; Hou JY; Riemers L; Gupta D; Kuo DY
Int J Med Robot; 2011 Mar; 7(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 21341363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology.
Escobar PF; Kebria M; Falcone T
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 21216452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of robot-assisted gynecologic surgery for patients with low and high BMI in a German gynecological cancer center.
Kannisto P; Harter P; Heitz F; Traut A; du Bois A; Kurzeder C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jul; 290(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 24532013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
