These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23086840)

  • 21. A practice of expert review by read-across using QSAR Toolbox.
    Fukuchi J; Kitazawa A; Hirabayashi K; Honma M
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30690463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
    Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
    Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Results of a round-robin exercise on read-across.
    Benfenati E; Belli M; Borges T; Casimiro E; Cester J; Fernandez A; Gini G; Honma M; Kinzl M; Knauf R; Manganaro A; Mombelli E; Petoumenou MI; Paparella M; Paris P; Raitano G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 May; 27(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 27167159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In silico prediction of genotoxicity.
    Wichard JD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 106(Pt B):595-599. PubMed ID: 27979779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Silico Prediction of Chemically Induced Mutagenicity: How to Use QSAR Models and Interpret Their Results.
    Mombelli E; Raitano G; Benfenati E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():87-105. PubMed ID: 27311463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward regulatory acceptance and improving the prediction confidence of in silico approaches: a case study of genotoxicity.
    Tcheremenskaia O; Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):987-1005. PubMed ID: 34078212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of in-house and off-the-shelf in silico models: implications on guidance for mutagenicity assessment.
    Jolly R; Ahmed KB; Zwickl C; Watson I; Gombar V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 25656493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. QSAR models to predict mutagenicity of acrylates, methacrylates and alpha,beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.
    Pérez-Garrido A; Helguera AM; Rodríguez FG; Cordeiro MN
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):397-415. PubMed ID: 20122717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrated strategy for mutagenicity prediction applied to food contact chemicals.
    Manganelli S; Schilter B; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Lo Piparo E
    ALTEX; 2018; 35(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 28922667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mutagens formed from beta-carbolines with aromatic amines.
    Totsuka Y; Takamura-Enya T; Nishigaki R; Sugimura T; Wakabayashi K
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2004 Mar; 802(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 15036005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of Toxtree and SciQSAR in silico predictive software using a publicly available benchmark mutagenicity database and their applicability for the qualification of impurities in pharmaceuticals.
    Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 23969001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of the structural requirements for mutagenicity by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals I: TA100 model.
    Mekenyan O; Dimitrov S; Serafimova R; Thompson E; Kotov S; Dimitrova N; Walker JD
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2004 Jun; 17(6):753-66. PubMed ID: 15206896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating the relationship between in vitro-in vivo genotoxicity: derivation of mechanistic QSAR models for in vivo liver genotoxicity and in vivo bone marrow micronucleus formation which encompass metabolism.
    Mekenyan OG; Petkov PI; Kotov SV; Stoeva S; Kamenska VB; Dimitrov SD; Honma M; Hayashi M; Benigni R; Donner EM; Patlewicz G
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 25(2):277-96. PubMed ID: 22196229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prioritization of mycotoxins based on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity evaluation using combined in silico QSAR methods.
    Lemée P; Fessard V; Habauzit D
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Apr; 323():121284. PubMed ID: 36804886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities.
    Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Follow-up actions from positive results of in vitro genetic toxicity testing.
    Dearfield KL; Thybaud V; Cimino MC; Custer L; Czich A; Harvey JS; Hester S; Kim JH; Kirkland D; Levy DD; Lorge E; Moore MM; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Schuler M; Suter W; Sweder K; Tarlo K; van Benthem J; van Goethem F; Witt KL
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Apr; 52(3):177-204. PubMed ID: 20963811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Data-based review of QSARs for predicting genotoxicity: the state of the art.
    Benigni R; Bossa C
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 30260416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.