BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23088186)

  • 1. The use of bur and laser for root caries treatment: a comparative study.
    Geraldo-Martins V; Thome T; Mayer M; Marques M
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 23088186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser therapy on pain during cavity preparation in paediatric dental patients: a pilot study.
    Eren F; Altinok B; Ertugral F; Tanboga I
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Jun; 12(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 23756423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Geraldo-Martins VR; Robles FR; Matos AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17618327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of etching with erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration.
    Marotti J; Geraldo-Martins VR; Bello-Silva MS; de Paula Eduardo C; Apel C; Gutknecht N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2010 May; 25(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 19011950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Er:YAG laser on the sealing of glass ionomer cement restorations of bacterial artificial root caries.
    Mello AM; Mayer MP; Mello FA; Matos AB; Marques MM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Aug; 24(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 16942426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sealing of silorane-based composite in laser-prepared primary teeth: effect of acid etching.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Fekrazad R
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 25303503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
    Aranha AC; Turbino ML; Powell GL; Eduardo Cde P
    Lasers Surg Med; 2005 Aug; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16037969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
    Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.